Volume 14, Issue 2, 2012
Symposium on Paul Moser's Religious Epistemology
Paul K. Moser
Natural Theology and the Evidence for God
Reply to Harold Netland, Charles Taliaferro, and Kate Waidler
This essay replies to the responses of Harold Netland, Charles Taliaferro, and Kate Waidler to my symposium paper, “Gethsemane Epistemology.” It contends that a God worthy of worship would not need the arguments of traditional natural theology, and that such arguments would not lead to such a God in the way desired by God. In addition, it explains why Paul’s position in Romans 1 offers no support to the arguments of traditional natural theology.