Volume 12, Issue 2, 2010
Theism and Ultimate Explanation
Graham Oppy
Pages 281-287
The Shape of Causal Reality
A Naturalistic Adaptation of O’Connor’s Cosmological Argument
In Theism and Ultimate Explanation, Tim O’Connor sets out and defends a cosmological argument from contingency. In my paper—which might have been titled “Naturalism and Ultimate Explanation: The Necessary Shape of Contingency”—I argue that, even if you grant O’Connor his various controversial assumptions about modality and causality, the argument that he sets out provides stronger support for naturalism than it does for theism. In particular, I claim that considerations about theoretical and ontological parsimony favour a naturalistic necessary shape for contingency over a theistic necessary shape for contingency.