Logos & Episteme

Volume 3, Issue 4, 2012

Luis Rosa
Pages 571-577

Justification and the Uniqueness Thesis

In this paper, I offer two counterexamples to the so-called ‘Uniqueness Thesis.’ As one of these examples rely on the thesis that it is possible for a justified belief to be based on an inconsistent body of evidence, I also offer reasons for this further thesis. On the assumption that doxastic justification entails propositional justification, the counterexamples seem to work.