PDC Homepage

Home » Products » Purchase

Logos & Episteme

Volume 2, Issue 2, 2011

Alex Bundy
Pages 287-292

In Defense of Epistemic Abstemiousness

The principle of suspension says that when you disagree with an epistemic peer about p, you should suspend judgment about p. In “Epistemic Abstainers, Epistemic Martyrs, and Epistemic Converts,” Scott F. Aikin, Michael Harbour, Jonathan Neufeld, and Robert B. Talisse argue against the principle of suspension, claiming that it “is deeply at odds with how we view ourselves as cognitive agents.” I argue that their arguments do not succeed.

Usage and Metrics