Journal of Philosophical Research

Volume 44, 2019

Sanford C. GoldbergOrcid-ID
Pages 63-77

Doxastic Responsibility is Owed to Others
Against Subjectivism

In this paper I argue that Rik Peels’s account of doxastic responsibility (in his 2017 book Responsible Belief) is too subjectivist, as it fails to deliver the correct verdicts in some cases in which one’s responsibilities derive from a social role and where one has misleading higher-order evidence about the first-order evidence. The take-home point is that the notion of responsibility in doxastic responsibility is something that is owed to others.