PDC Homepage

Home » Products » Purchase

The Journal of Philosophy

Volume 117, Issue 2, February 2020

Christine Tiefensee
Pages 96-114

"Ought" and Error

The moral error theory generally does not receive good press in metaethics. This paper adds to the bad news. In contrast to other critics, though, I do not attack error theorists’ characteristic thesis that no moral assertion is ever true. Instead, I develop a new counter-argument which questions error theorists’ ability to defend their claim that moral utterances are (typically) meaningful assertions. More precisely: Moral error theorists lack a convincing account of the meaning of deontic moral assertions, or so I will argue.

Usage and Metrics
Dimensions
PDC