PDC Homepage

Home » Products » Purchase

Idealistic Studies

Volume 50, Issue 3, Fall 2020

Hugo E. HerreraOrcid-ID
Pages 221-232

Knowledge of the Whole in Friedrich Hölderlin’s “Being Judgement Possibility”
Dieter Henrich and Manfred Frank’s Interpretations

In “Being Judgement Possibility,” Hölderlin posits that the division between subject and object produced in conscious knowledge requires admitting a being as the ground of that knowledge’s unity. Commentators argue over the way to access such being according to Hölderlin. For Dieter Henrich, being is a presupposition recognized reflexively. Manfred Frank, by contrast, maintains that Hölderlin grants direct access to it in an “intellectual intuition.” This article addresses the respective interpretations of both authors. It shows that Frank’s interpretation is closer to the textual evidence than Henrich’s interpretation. Frank’s interpretation also allows one to explain better the way in which the division between subject and object avoids leading to dispersal. Finally, this article considers the insufficiency of Frank’s interpretation so as to clarify an issue that he himself advances in the course of his argument: how the I manages to distinguish itself in the sphere of intuitable objects.

Usage and Metrics