Grazer Philosophische Studien

Volume 41, 1991

Ermanno Bencivenga
Pages 99-104

Empirical Private Languages and the Perfect Simulator

In an attempt at fleshing out the thesis that religious (and other similar) experiences cannot be attributed to an individual on the basis of outer behaviour alone, the hypothesis is entertained of somebody who decides, at a certain point in his life, to fool everybody into beUeving that he is a reUgious beUever. This person, it is claimed, lacks the inner conviction that is crucial to religious experiences. Does this claim fall prey to Wittgenstein-like objections to the possibility of a private language? It is argued that it does not, by distinguishing between what counts empirically, and what conceptually, as a private language.