Volume 13, Issue 1, Spring 2008
Making „Reasons " Explicit. How Normative is Brandom's Inferentialism?
This paper asks whether Brandom has provided a sufficiently clear account of the basic normative concepts of commitment and entitlement, on which
his normative inferentialism seems to rest, and of how they contribute to explain the inferential articulation of conceptual contents. I show that Brandom's claim that these concepts are analogous to the concepts of obligation and permission cannot be right, and argue that the normative character of the concept of commitment is dubious. This leads me to replace Brandom's conception of inferential relations as relations between deontic statuses with one according to which they are to be seen as relations between entitlements and acknowledgements of commitments.