PDC Homepage

Home » Products » Purchase

Fichte-Studien

Volume 44, 2017

Fichte und seine Zeit

Daniel Breazeale
Pages 3-16
DOI: 10.5840/fichte2017443

Fichte, Skepticism, and the ‘Agrippan Trilemma'

In his recent All or Nothing: Systematicity, Transcendental Arguments, and Skepticism in German Idealism (Cambridge, ma: Harvard University Press, 2005), Paul Franks defends Maimonian skepticism and explicitly criticizes Fichte’s response to the same. I argue that Franks’ interpretation of Fichte’s response to skepticism is fundamentally flawed in that it ignores or misinterprets the critically important practical/moral dimension of Fichte’s response. I also challenge Franks’ interpretation of the Jena Wissenschaftslehre as a »derivation holistic monism« and argue for a more modest interpretation of the same and one more in keeping with Fichte’s appreciation of the force of philosophical skepticism and the limits of transcendental philosophizing.

Usage and Metrics
Dimensions
PDC