Volume 15, Issue 2, April 1998
Reflections on the 20th Anniversary of the Society of Christian philosophers
William Lane Craig
On Hasker’s Defense of Anti-Molinism
In a pair of recent articles, William Hasker has attempted to defend Robert Adams’s new anti-Molinist argument. But I argue that the sense of explanatory priority operative in the argument is either equivocal or, if a univocal sense can be given to it, it is either so generic that we should have to deny its transitivity or so weak that it would not be incompatible with human freedom.