PDC Homepage

Home » Products » Purchase

Epistemology & Philosophy of Science

Volume 57, Issue 2, 2020

Anait Meloian, Andrey V. Sharypin
Pages 208-225

Epistemological Analysis of the Concept of Time in Esai Krymetsy’s Scientific Heritage

Modern science leaves the specific nature of temporality unclear, despite the generally accepted notions of the unity and diversity of the forms of time. In contrast to the nature of space, the history of the development of views on the nature of time is neither evolutionary nor revolutionary. As a result, the focal point of the person biological and cognitive unity is regarded only as an auxiliary tool for constructing a computable world. Considering that the activity of consciousness was and remains the condition for the synthesis of Time, the way out of the current situation is in a constructive transition from the ontological claims of science to the study of epistemology of temporality, from the question “what is time” to the question “why is it possible to move”. Using the example of little-known data from the Armenian history of science about Esai Krymetsy, 15th century medieval astronomist, authors reconstruct the primary cognitive mechanisms of secularization and desacralization of the nature of time.

Usage and Metrics
Dimensions
PDC