Search narrowed by:

Displaying: 81-100 of 506 documents

Show/Hide alternate language

0.344 sec

81. Sententiae: Volume > 38 > Issue: 2
Сергій Секундант, Ілля Орехов, Катерина Устименко, Марія Шевчук Sergei Secundant
Історія філософії як покликання
History of Philosophy as a Vocation

82. Sententiae: Volume > 38 > Issue: 2
Анатолій Ахутін, Ксенія Зборовська, Всеволод Хома, Руслан Мироненко Anatoly Akhutin
Життя думки: акт мислення за часів тоталітаризму
Life of Thought: the Act of Thinking in the Times of Totalitarism. Part I

83. Sententiae: Volume > 38 > Issue: 2
Аміна Кхелуфі Amina Khelufi
Науковий семінар Студентського товариства усної історії філософії
Scientific Seminar of the Student Society of Oral History of Philosophy

abstract | view |  rights & permissions
On November 25, 2019, a scientific seminar organized by the Student Society of Oral History of Philosophy was held at the Department of the History of Philosophy of the Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. The main topic of discussion was the status of the oral history of philosophy (OHF) as a scientific discipline: its research goals and place among research practices. There were two main points in the discussion: OHF as a set of empirical interview-based methods and OHF as a separate historico-philosophical discipline with its own area of research. Were also discussed the criteria of distinguishing between "philosophical" OHF and OHF, which is a simple application of oral history techniques in the realm of interviewing philosophers.
84. Sententiae: Volume > 32 > Issue: 1
Михайло Якубович Mykhaylo Yakubovych
Онтологія ібн Арабі та Садр ад-Діна аль-Кунаві в інтерпретації кримського мислителя Ахмада бін Абдаллаха аль-Кримі
Ontology of Ibn Arabi and Sadr ad-Din al-Qunawi in the Interpretation of Crimean Thinker Ahmad bin ‘Abdallah al-Qrimi

abstract | view |  rights & permissions
The study is dedicated to the work of Crimean scholar Ahmad bin ‘Abdallah al-Qrimi, who was one of the most advanced interpreters of the Ibn Arabi’s and Sadr al-Din al-Qunawi’s Sufi philosophy. Ahmad al-Qrimi employed Ibn Sina’s views on division of essence and existence, as well as some concepts of Maturidi kalam. His manuscript work “Advise for the Perplexed and Key for the Exigent” shows main dimensions of Ahmad al-Qrimi’s thought as following: 1) The notion of Being in the works of Ibn Arabi and Sadr al-Din al-Qunawi is interpreted as the idea of necessary existence, as suggested by ibn Sina; 2) the conception of the identity of the absolute and necessary being is understood as the only right approach for the solution of polemics between adepts and critics of Sufism; 3) conception of “correlation” is considered as solution for the problem of relations between mind and reality.
85. Sententiae: Volume > 32 > Issue: 1
Юрій Федорченко Yurij Fedorchenko
Кантова таблиця суджень і вчення про судження в німецькій логіці ХVІІІ століття
Kant's Table of Judgments and the Doctrine of the Judgment in the German Logic of XVIIIth Century

abstract | view |  rights & permissions
The article focuses on the formation of Kant's table of judgments. The author proves the dependence of Kant's table of judgments on the doctrine of judgment in German 17th century logic. The author proves the influence of George Meier’s «Auszug aus der Vernunftlehre » on formation of the Kantian doctrine of judgment and the table of judgments. This effect consists in the fact that (1) the starting point for Kant's search of the concept of judgment was Meier's definition of judgment in § 292 of «Auszug aus der Vernunftlehre », (2) Kant's table of judgments in «Critique of Pure Reason» appeared as a follow-up of twenty-five critical reflection at §§ 292-352 of Meier's treatise. However, Kant's table of judgments depends also on transcendental logic. The original forms of judgment in Kant's table of judgments contain functional unities, which create the subject of a judgment. Kant's table of judgments depends on both German tradition of 17th century logic and the theory of subject as a part of Kant's transcendental logic.
86. Sententiae: Volume > 32 > Issue: 1
Александр Юдин Alexander Yudin
Зарождение дискуссии об авторской интенции в американской критике и философии
The Origin of the Discussion of Author’s Intention in American Criticism and Philosophy

abstract | view |  rights & permissions
The article deals with the origin and formation of debating positions in American criticism and philosophy. It analyzes “Intentional Fallacy” by W. Wimsatt and M. Beardsley. as well as E.D. Hirsch’s texts concerning the idea of objective interpretation which initiated this discussion. In fact, both positions are limited because of their normative and ahistorical character. Both sides try to regulate interpretation. Wimsatt and Beardsley lose the historical place of a text, whereas Hirsch reduces the historical place of an interpreter. Anti-intentionalism of Wimsatt and Beardsley relies on interpretative practice of American New Criticism with its principle of work’s autonomy. Despite the article’s empirical character, its important outcome is negation of subjectivity of meaning, and formulation of premises of its intersubjective understanding. Hirsch affirms the invariability of work’s meaning and with this purpose (1) identifies it with the author’s intention binding it with the notion of intentionality and author’s horizoncontext (based on Husserl and Dilthey), (2) introduces the distinction between meaning and significance (based on Frege and Saussure). Despite the contradictions of Hirsch’s positions both in understanding these ideas and in his own conclusions, his merit is the statement of the problem of meaning in general and extending the discussion into the territory of hermeneutics and philosophy of literature.
87. Sententiae: Volume > 32 > Issue: 1
Анна Лактіонова Anna Laktionova
Cogito ergo sum і філософія дії
Cogito Ergo Sum and Philofsophy of Action

abstract | view |  rights & permissions
Analytical philosophy opens new perspectives of studies in the history of philosophy. There are (1) generalized history of analytical interpretations of Cartesian principle cogito ergo sum and (2) analysis of Cartesianism through the prism of contemporary philosophy of action, with special attention to performativity of the mentioned principle. The importance of such research necessarily goes beyond "pure" history of philosophy: it also contributes to revision of traditional approaches to justification of knowledge (foundationalism, coherentism, reliabilism), which still remain problematic. Attention to performativism of cogito ergo sum thesis is the key to new convenient interpretation of knowledge justification problem, because it allows for justification as selfjustification in terms of accomplishment. Inevitable accomplishment, peculiar to evidfently performative knowledge (example of which is cogito ergo sum, a very good contender for the role of a sure foundation), suggests that fundamentalist strategy of knowledge justification, in the perspective of philosophy of action, amounts to a preferable interpretation compared to traditional epistemological approach.
88. Sententiae: Volume > 32 > Issue: 1
Андрій Дахній Andriy Dakhniy
Гайдеґерове «довільне» прочитання Канта: подолання неокантіанства і темпоралізація трансцендентального схематизму
Heidegger’s «Arbitrary» Reading of Kant: the Overcoming of Neo-Kantianism and Temporalization of Transcendental Schematism

abstract | view |  rights & permissions
The paper examines the influence of Kant's theoretical philosophy on formation of phenomenological interpretation of temporal issues in Heidegger's thinking, both in terms of his positive perception of Kant's recent approaches (schematism of pure conceptions of understanding, transcendental faculty of imagination as a primary temporariness and as the essence of human being), as well as in terms of negative repulsion (proposition of ontological alternatives to Kant's Gnoseologism, criticism of his attempt to replace basically temporal transcendental faculty of imagination with atemporal understanding). The paper emphasizes specificity and even "arbitrariness" of Heidegger's interpretation of Kantian theoretical philosophizing. This interpretation fits into the strategy of destruction of Western metaphysics, but significantly differs the Neo-Kantianism interpretations in focusing not so much on limited cognitive capacity, but rather on the limitations of human existence as such. Finally, it is shown that Heidegger attempted to demonstrate the structuring of the sense of being via schematism of ecstatic-horizontal temporariness inspired by Kant's influence.
89. Sententiae: Volume > 32 > Issue: 1
Віталій Терлецький Vitali Terletsky
Аристотелева теорія часу у світлі феноменологічної традиції
Aristotle’s Theory of Time in the Light of the Phenomenological Tradition

abstract | view |  rights & permissions
The paper deals with reconstitution of tradition, whose representatives (M. Heidegger, W. Bröcker, E. Fink, K.-H. Volkmann-Schluck, K. Held, G. Figal) at any given time in their own way interpret the doctrine of time in Aristotle’s «Physics» in the phenomenological resp. hermeneutic perspective. It focuses on the relation of time and change, the problems of identity and difference of «now», temporal and timeless meaning of próteron – hýsteron, the relationship of time and soul, the sense of «being-in-time» thesis. In this tradition the need for «a systematic reconstruction» of the Stagirite’s arguments and examination of coherence of certain propositions is frequently emphasized, This is motivated, on the one hand, by the development of temporal thematic within phenomenology itself, and, on the other hand, by the dissociation from only historical or philological reading of this classical text.
90. Sententiae: Volume > 32 > Issue: 1
Юрґен Штольценберґ Jürgen Stolzenberg
Мартин Гайдеґер читає Фіхте
Martin Heidegger Reads Fichte

abstract | view |  rights & permissions
A new world opened up before Heidegger when he lectured on Fichte, Hegel and Schelling for the first time in the summer term of 1929. This is what Heidegger wrote to Karl Jaspers in June, 1929. The paper shows how Heidegger interpreted Fichte. In lecturing on Fichte, Heidegger became aware of the original quality of Fichte’s philosophy in relation to his own theory in Being and Time. Heidegger tried to give Fichte’s view its due precisely with the aim of emphasizing and underlining the justness of his own claims. This can be seen in the way Heidegger interpreted the foundation of Fichte’s early Wissenschaftslehre. Following Heidegger, the third basic principle with its concept of limitation has to be the very fundamental principle. Secondly, Heidegger rejected technical aspects of deduction and systematic character of Fichte’s Wissenschaftslehre. Interpreting the content of Fichte’s concept of «Tathandlung» and his theory of imagination Heidegger sees a perspective that he develops in Being and Time.
91. Sententiae: Volume > 32 > Issue: 1
Степан Іваник Stepan Ivanyk
Що таке польська філософія й що вона може дати українській філософії?
What is Polish Philosophy and What Can It Give to Ukrainian Philosophy?

abstract | view |  rights & permissions
The article examines discussion wich took place in 1911 between Polish philosophers Henryk Struve and Kazimierz Twardowski about the state of Polish philosophy and plans for its future development. The results of the discussion were extrapolated to the current situation of Ukrainian philosophy and its challenges. The conclusion is that the path of Polish philosophy of the last century can serve to modern Ukrainian philosophy as reliable guide to the future. Polish philosophy’s recipe of success transferred to modern Ukrainian philosophy consists in, firstly, elimination of external domination of Russian influence due to its balancing by other foreign influences, and, secondly, purposeful development of analytical direction.
92. Sententiae: Volume > 32 > Issue: 1
Ельвіра Чухрай Elvira Chukhray
Остаточна мета життя і сенс в житті: історикофілософські межі раціональної реконструкції
The Ultimate Purpose of Life and the Meaning in Life: History of Philosophy and Limits of Rational Reconstruction

abstract | view |  rights & permissions
The article analyses whether it is correct to extrapolate the concept of “meaning in life” developed by Thaddeus Metz to the doctrines of ancient philosophers, including Thomas Aquinas. Is Metz’ concept of “purposes” that make “human life” meaningful analogous to Aquinas’ concept of “ultimate purpose of man”? Significant points of Metz’ conception of “meaning in life” in our article are described and compared with Aquinas’ conception of “ultimate purpose of man.” As it turns out, these conceptions are only superficially similar. In fact, they are profoundly different: (1) Aquinas is talking about the “purpose of man”, which implies objective teleology incompatible with Metz’ “naturalism”, and is not talking about “meaning in life” (and even “purpose of life”); (2) “ultimate purpose of man”, for Aquinas, is intended to provide salvation and eternal life for man, not to make life “significant” in this world. Thus, Metz and Aquinas not only use different terminology, but also address different problems. They deal with different questions, not just give different answers to the same question (about the “meaning in life”). Metz’s extrapolation may be correct, when viewed as a kind of rational reconstruction. However, Metz does not make appropriate reservations and groundlessly unifies heterogeneous problems. The article shows that more historically oriented methodology avoids impropriety in the exercise of rational reconstruction of “meaning in life” in the field of ancient and medieval philosophies.
93. Sententiae: Volume > 32 > Issue: 1
Abstracts [UKR]

94. Sententiae: Volume > 32 > Issue: 1
Іван Лисий Ivan Lysyi
Проблемність національно-культурної ідентифікації української філософії (за матеріалами ХХХ тому Sententiae)
Problematicity of the National Cultural Identification of Ukrainian Philosophy (based on the articles from XXX-th issue of Sententiae)

abstract | view |  rights & permissions
The paper contains the critical review of materials from the rubric «Could “national philosophy” be strictly defined research object?» (Sententiae, 2014, № 1).
95. Sententiae: Volume > 32 > Issue: 1
Казимеж Айдукевич Kazimierz Ajdukiewicz
Похвала працьовитому життю
A Praise of Laborious Life

96. Sententiae: Volume > 32 > Issue: 1
Abstracts [RUS]

97. Sententiae: Volume > 40 > Issue: 2
Сергій Секундант Sergii Secundan
Вольф і еклектицизм: від поняття відкритої системи до систематичного інтелекту
Wolf and Eclecticism: From the Concept of an Open System to Systematic Intelligence

abstract | view |  rights & permissions
The paper provides a comparative analysis of the programs of reforms of philosophy developed by Christian Wolff and the members of the Eclecticist school. It reveals the critical foundations of the concepts of the system by both schools and assesses the prospects of their further development. Although Wolff is often inconsistent, he is nevertheless closer to Descartes and Leibniz, and therefore to the Platonic tradition. The Eclecticists, on the other hand, are closer to the Peripatetic tradition, and therefore to empiricism. From the point of view of the history of philosophical methodology, Wolff’s program combines Cartesianism and the German tradition of methodical thinking (J. Jung, E. Weigel and Leibniz), which both were oriented towards mathematics. The Eclecticists, on the other hand, used the dialectical model, which they modernized by introducing the principle of historicism and applying it to the history of philosophy. When the program of the Eclecticists was guided by the critical selection of knowledge by members of the "scientific community" and the concept of an open system, Wolff’s synthesis of knowledge is carried out on the basis of a rigorous method. He puts forward a fundamentally new idea of a universal system based on new normative requirements for the system-forming principle - it must be fundamental, generally valid and immanent in the system of knowledge. Wolff does not reject the critical program of the Eclecticists; he tries to prove that the successful implementation of their program is possible only if there is a basic system of truths and a reliable method. In his treatise On the Difference Between Systematic and Non-systematic Intellect, Wolff laid the foundation of “systematic eclecticism” and “speculative criticism”, which was substantiated in the works by "classics of German idealism", primarily by C. L. Reinhold and Hegel.
98. Sententiae: Volume > 40 > Issue: 2
Анастасія Стрелкова Anastasia Strelkova
Три поняття буддійської філософії: «мислення», «розум», «свідомість» (до проблеми перекладу)
Three Concepts of Buddhist Philosophy: «Thought», «Mind», «Consciousness» (the problem of translation)

abstract | view |  rights & permissions
This paper analyses the three main concepts of Buddhist philosophy of consciousness and considers the problem of their translation into Ukrainian. The author shows that it is necessary to compare the terms related to different Buddhist traditions’ (Pali, Sanskrit, Chinese and al.) in order to adequately translate them into modern languages. The analysis of a passage (II.34) from Vasubandhu’s Abhidharmakośa in various translations points out the necessity to translate a whole system of Buddhist terminology, but not the separate terms taken individually, in order to avoid the incompatibility of translated terms with each other.
99. Sententiae: Volume > 40 > Issue: 2
Павло Бартусяк Pavlo Bartusiak
Стоїцизм Дельоза. Jonhson, R. J. (2020). Deleuze, a Stoic. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Deleuze’s Stoicism. Jonhson, R. J. (2020). Deleuze, a Stoic. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

100. Sententiae: Volume > 40 > Issue: 2
Юрій Завгородній Yurii Zavhorodnii
Класична індійська філософія в оксфордській серії «Історія філософії без жодних прогалин»: Adamson, P., & Ganeri, J. (2020). Classical Indian Philosophy: a History of Philosophy Without any Gaps, Volume 5
Classical Indian Philosophy in the Oxford series "History of Philosophy without any Gaps"