Narrow search


By category:

By publication type:

By language:

By journals:

By document type:


Displaying: 61-80 of 147 documents

0.244 sec

61. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 3 > Issue: 1/2
Jocelyn Benoist Quelques remarques sur la doctrine brentanienne de l’évidence
62. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 3 > Issue: 1/2
Bruce Bégout Percevoir et Juger: Le rôle de la croyance originelle (urdoxa) dans la théorie du jugement de Husserl
63. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 3 > Issue: 1/2
Claudio Majolino Le différend logique: jugement et énoncé: Eléments pour une reconstruction du débat entre Husserl et Marty
64. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 3 > Issue: 1/2
Victor Popescu Espace et mouvement chez Stumpf et Husserl: Une Approche Méréologique
65. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 3 > Issue: 3/4
Pascal Dupond Nature et Logos: d’une pensée de la fondation (Fundierung) à une pensée de l’entrelacs (Ineinander)
66. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 3 > Issue: 3/4
Malika Temmar Effets de présence et ostension: Une approche discursive
67. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 3 > Issue: 3/4
Alain Beaulieu La réforme du concept phénoménologique de «monde» par Gilles Deleuze
68. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 3 > Issue: 3/4
Éliane Escoubas Merleau-Ponty et l’esthétique
69. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 3 > Issue: 3/4
Renaud Barbaras Le problème du chiasme
70. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 3 > Issue: 3/4
Emmanuel de Saint Aubert Le mystère de la chair: Merleau-Ponty et Gabriel Marcel
71. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 3 > Issue: 3/4
Adina Bozga, Ion Copoeru Introduction
72. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 3 > Issue: 3/4
Etienne Bimbenet «Voir c’est toujours voir plus qu’on ne voit»: Merleau-Ponty et la texture onirique du sensible
73. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 3 > Issue: 3/4
Pierre Rodrigo Ni le corps ni l’esprit: La chair de Husserl à Merleau-Ponty
74. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 3 > Issue: Special
François Fédier L’irréprochable
75. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 3 > Issue: Special
Françoise Dastur La poésie comme origine (Hölderlin et Heidegger)
76. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 3 > Issue: Special
François Vezin Art, mondialisation, primitivisme
77. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 3 > Issue: Special
Eliane Escoubas Walter Biemel et les oeuvres de peinture: la «révolution copernicienne» de Picasso
78. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 4 > Issue: 1/2
Pascal Chabot L’idéalité enchaînée: Husserl et la question des « mondes possibles »
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
The aim of this paper is to show how the concept of “possible world”, that Husserl inherits from his study of logics, is capital for the understanding of his phenomenology. This concept is a fine tool that provides him a possibility to articulate the question of the physical and the cultural dimensions of some objects. A cultural object as a book or a painting has in fact two dimensions: a “material” one and a “spiritual” one. The author examines which are the relationships between those two dimensions. This question leads him to an interrogation on the genesis of the ideality of the cultural world. Is there not a contradiction between the ideality of the meaning and his historical genesis? In order to provide an answer to this question, the author suggests that one may use the notion of a “linked ideality”, i.e. ideal but linked up to the earth.
79. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 4 > Issue: 1/2
Jean-Claude Gens L’esthétique Brentanienne Comme Science Normative
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
According to Brentano, logic, ethics and aesthetics are practical normative sciences, and they correspond to the three classes of psychic phenomena. But if a judgment or a love may be correct or incorrect, it seems more difficult to speak of a correct representation as this class of phenomena ignores a polarity such as right / wrong or good / bad. Brentano speaks nevertheless from the aesthetical “value” of representations. Aesthetics could in this way be considered as part of a general theory of value; but compared to ethics the specificity of this science tends to vanish. Another way to consider the question is to remember that the distinction among the three classes of psychic phenomena is only formal. It means that one has to question more precisely the very nature of representation and especially its relation to feeling.
80. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 4 > Issue: 1/2
Servanne Jollivet Heidegger, lecteur d’Aristote: Du mouvement à la mobilité dans l’herméneutique facticielle (1919-1924)
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
Bringing back reflection to the mobility of the existence, a systematic re-appropriation of the Aristotelian concept of movement underlines the Heideggerian re-foundation of philosophy. Hence deconstructed and elaborated through “mobility”, the notion of movement constitutes the foundation stone that allows to play Aristotle against Aristotle and to contribute, via his hermeneutical reinvestment, to the “destruction” of the substantialist tradition.