Displaying: 141-160 of 165 documents

1.466 sec

141. Chiasmi International: Volume > 20
Maurice Merleau-Ponty Elogio della filosofia
142. Chiasmi International: Volume > 20
Maurice Merleau-Ponty Intervento a proposito di “Commentaire sur l’idée de la phénoménologie” de A. De Waelhens
143. Chiasmi International: Volume > 20
Maurice Merleau-Ponty Intervento a proposito di “La phénoménologie contre The Concept of Mind” di G. Ryle
144. Chiasmi International: Volume > 20
Maurice Merleau-Ponty Una lettera di Maurice Merleau-Ponty a Jacques Garelli
145. Chiasmi International: Volume > 20
Maurice Merleau-Ponty Una lettera di Maurice Merleau-Ponty a Éric Weil
146. Chiasmi International: Volume > 20
Maurice Merleau-Ponty Lettere di Maurice Merleau-Ponty ad Alphonse De Waelhens, 1946-1961
147. Chiasmi International: Volume > 20
Maurice Merleau-Ponty Una lettera di Maurice Merleau-Ponty a Simone De Beauvoir
148. Chiasmi International: Volume > 21
Galen A. Johnson Presentazione
149. Chiasmi International: Volume > 21
Lovisa Andén, Franck Robert Introduzione: Le problème de la parole, estratto della lezione del 25 febbraio 1954. Proust e la letteratura
150. Chiasmi International: Volume > 21
Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Claudio Rozzoni Estratto. Proust. Una teoria, – e una pratica concordante, – del linguaggio
151. Chiasmi International: Volume > 21
Galen A. Johnson Introduzione: Su letteratura e verità
152. Chiasmi International: Volume > 21
Federico Leoni Proust e la biologia. È possibile una letteratura di fantasmi?
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
This article examines the place of literature in the ensemble of Merleau-Ponty’s research, comparing the function it fills in the economy of his thought to the role other practices and other disciplines such as biology and psychology play in his philosophy. Each of these “discourses” offered Merleau-Ponty access to something comparable to a common phantasmatic substance, a common metaphorical stability of Being, that the biologist, the writer, and the psychoanalyst work on, each in their own writings and categories. But here emerges also a major question. To what extent does the language of Proust reveal itself up to the task of writing the phantasm, to what extent does it respond to this challenge? In what manner are the limits of his language, which are perhaps the limits of language itself, an obstacle to his project? And what is it that permits, at times, the sciences to obtain greater success in engaging in this way? Was it precisely the structure of metaphor that hindered Proust in truly writing encroachment, and the dimension of metonymy was, on the contrary, that in which a certain scientific discourse succeeded at setting itself up on the first try? If, finally and especially, metonymy was the very heart of metaphor, with more or less success touched by one or the other of the “regional” writings of the phantasm?
153. Chiasmi International: Volume > 21
Giuseppe Crivella Le sensible est introuvable... Merleau-Ponty e il linguaggio: da La prose du monde alle Cinq notes sur Claude Simon
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
The purpose of this paper is to study the role of language in the philosophy of Merleau-Ponty. In particular, our analysis will concentrate mainly on The Prose of the World and, following that, on the notes about the novels of Claude Simon. Thus, we will attempt to discern the specific nature of such language, analyzing its sources, exploring its limits, and examining in detail its potentialities.
154. Chiasmi International: Volume > 21
Gianluca Solla Entrando al cinema. Il ritmo come segreto del mondo
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
In the text of his lecture on “Film and the new psychology,” Merleau-Ponty introduces a singular and decisive reading of filmic art, approaching the notion of “rhythm.” This notion engages in a reflection on image and on the relation between the image and the gaze of the spectator at the cinema. In this article, Merleau-Ponty’s actual usage of this notion and the meaning of this operation will be read starting from the reflection of Émile Benveniste on rhythm as well as certain notes presented in Merleau-Ponty’s courses at the Collège de France on The sensible world and the world of expression and Research on the literary usages of language, that follow some years after the lecture.
155. Chiasmi International: Volume > 21
Ann V. Murphy Introduzione: Il significato del luogo
156. Chiasmi International: Volume > 14
Roberta Dreon Roberta Dreon (Università degli Studi di Venezia) Merleau-Ponty. una concezione non soggettocentrica dell’empatia?
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
Merleau-Ponty. Une conception de l’empathie non centrée sur le sujet?Cet article étudie l’émergence du terme « empathie » dans les textes de Merleau-Ponty. Il souligne que le concept n’est pas avant tout présenté comme une catégorie épistémologique, remettant en question si et comment nous pouvons éventuellement connaître les autres. Au contraire, il est conçu comme une catégorie ontologique, pour dire notre appartenance à une nature commune. De ce point de vue, il propose une façon sensible pour comprendre les autres, basée sur une proximité et un partage physiques.Mais, avec des références à l’actuel débat, le texte suggère que, dans les réflexions du phénoménologue français, il est possible de trouver un paradigme qui n’est pas centré sur une conception subjective de l’empathie – c’est a dire qu’il s’agit d’un paradigme qui ne suppose pas toujours une projection subjective de ma sensibilité sur celle des autres. Plutôt, il peut à la fois consister en un sentiment commun, prépersonnel, qui constitue l’arrière-plan de nos sensibilités conscientes, et aussi proceder de l’autre être humain à moi, alors que souvent je sens et comprendre moi-même par differentiation des autres personnes, qui s’imposent sur mes sentiments et sur mes mots.Merleau-Ponty. A Conception of Empathy not centered on the Subject?This paper investigates the emergence of the term “empathy” in Merleau-Ponty’s texts. It points out that the concept is not primarly introduced as an epistemological category, questioning if and how eventually we can know the others. On the contrary it is meant as an ontological category, in order to say our belonging to a common nature. From this point of view he proposes a sensible way to understanding the others, based on a bodily closeness and sharing.But, with references to the current debate, the text suggests that in the reflections of the French phenomenologist it is possible to find a not subjectively centered paradigm for understandig empathy – that is a paradigm which does not always presuppose a subjective projection of my sensibility on that of the other ones. It can rather both consist in a common, prepersonal feeling, costituting the background of our conscious sensitivities, and proceed from the other human being to me, so that I often feel and understand myself by differing from the other individuals, who impose themselves on my senses and on my words.
157. Chiasmi International: Volume > 14
Federico Leoni Presentazione
158. Chiasmi International: Volume > 14
Philippe Descola L’Ontologia degli altri: Intervista di Davide Scarso su Maurice Merleau-Ponty
159. Chiasmi International: Volume > 14
Federico Leoni, Davide Scarso Introduzione
160. Chiasmi International: Volume > 14
Guillaume Carron Introduzione