Narrow search

By category:

By publication type:

By language:

By journals:

By document type:

Displaying: 1-20 of 94 documents

0.038 sec

1. Eco-ethica: Volume > 2
The Authors
2. Eco-ethica: Volume > 3
Lars Hertzberg Nature is Dead, Long Live The Environment!
3. Eco-ethica: Volume > 3
Rebecka Lettevall The nature of war and the culture of peace
4. Eco-ethica: Volume > 3
Peter Kemp, Noriko Hashimoto Preface
5. Eco-ethica: Volume > 3
Richard Kearney Translating across Faith Cultures: Radical Hospitality
6. Eco-ethica: Volume > 3
Bengt Kristensson Uggla Ricœur’s History: The Historical Horizon in Paul Ricœur’s Philosophical Project
7. Eco-ethica: Volume > 3
Manuel B. Dy, Jr. The Confucian Golden Rule in Times of Poverty and Affluence
8. Eco-ethica: Volume > 3
Jacob Dahl Rendtorff Ethics after Fukushima!: Reflections on Institutional Decision-Making in Complex Organizational Systems
9. Eco-ethica: Volume > 3
Peter McCormick Internationalizing Law and Human Contingency: On Mireille Delmas-Marty and Paul Ricœur
10. Eco-ethica: Volume > 3
Noriko Hashimoto Conflicts between Environmental Philosophy and Cultural Problems
11. Eco-ethica: Volume > 3
Robert Bernasconi Kant and the Distinction between Nature and Culture: Its Role in Recent Defenses of His Cosmopolitanism
12. Eco-ethica: Volume > 3
The Authors / Les Auteurs
13. Eco-ethica: Volume > 3
David Rasmussen Public Reason and Democratic Culture
14. Eco-ethica: Volume > 3
Peter Kemp, Noriko Hashimoto Editorial
15. Eco-ethica: Volume > 3
Jacob Dahl Rendtorff Paul Ricoeur on Philosophy and Theology
16. Eco-ethica: Volume > 3
Peter McCormick Limited Sovereignties?
17. Eco-ethica: Volume > 4
Peter McCormick Essential Sovereignties?: Political, Ethical, and Personal
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
Politics and ethics are closely linked in many ways. One such link is the central but still contentious notion of the person. Take the case of today’s European Union. Most basically, member states disagree on what and who persons are. This EU paradox may be resolved when political debates about sovereignty’s limits expand to include ethical discussions of the nature of persons. The aim of this paper is to point in the direction of an account of the person that will support proper understandings of those ethical, and not just political, values that the Preamble of any eventual European Union constitution will need to entrench tomorrow.
18. Eco-ethica: Volume > 4
Peter Kemp, Noriko Hashimoto Editorial
19. Eco-ethica: Volume > 4
Noriko Hashimoto Negative Technology and Solidarity: An Essay on the Development from Ethics to Politics
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
A characteristic feature of the 21st century is that every important thing is invisible: boundaries, technological risk, global warming, etc. In Eco-ethica, a new ethics in contrast to Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics must be developed with respect to these invisible realities. What should we do to demolish the nuclear facilities at Fukushima? This is a question of “technica negativa”, the invisible process of demolition. The problem must be examined through ethics, Kant’s legal thinking and, finally, politics. Habermas’ idea of “solidarity” is fruitful here because he insists on civic democracy at a transnational scale. This idea may be linked to a new form of cosmopolitanism.
20. Eco-ethica: Volume > 4
Peter Kemp Ricœur’s Reticence with Regard to Kierkegaard
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
This paper tries to answer the question: why did Paul Ricœur keep a nearly total silence after 1963 about Soren Kierkegaard, and was there from the beginning a reticence with regard to Kierkegaard? An answer can be found in the beginning of Ricœur’s work, in his first book written with Mikel Dufrenne on Karl Jaspers et la philosophie de I ’existence. This book that is full of references to Kierkegaard also shows that it was Jaspers’ particular appropriation of the Danish thinker that affected him. But, like Jaspers, Ricœur became too preoccupied with external historical, social and political life to be a true disciple of Kierkegaard.