Narrow search


By category:

By publication type:

By language:

By journals:

By document type:


Displaying: 1-12 of 12 documents

0.022 sec

1. Process Studies: Volume > 1 > Issue: 2
David Griffin The Process Theology of Norman Pittenger: A Review Article
2. Process Studies: Volume > 16 > Issue: 1
Duane H. Whittier The Acts of Our Being: A Reflection on Agency and Responsibility
3. Process Studies: Volume > 16 > Issue: 1
Carol Johnston Community: A Trinity of Models
4. Process Studies: Volume > 16 > Issue: 1
Donald Wayne Viney God’s World, God’s Body
5. Process Studies: Volume > 16 > Issue: 1
Bob Mesle Evil and the Process God
6. Process Studies: Volume > 16 > Issue: 1
Theodore Vitali Whitehead’s Metaphysics of Extension and Solidarity
7. Process Studies: Volume > 16 > Issue: 2
James W. Felt Whitehead und der Prozessbegriff/Whitehead and The Idea of Process
8. Process Studies: Volume > 16 > Issue: 2
J. Harley Chapman New Essays in Metaphysics
9. Process Studies: Volume > 16 > Issue: 2
Robert S. Brumbaugh Four Kinds of Time?: A Response to David Griffin’s Review of Unreality and Time
10. Process Studies: Volume > 16 > Issue: 2
Gordon D. Kaufman American Religious Empiricism
11. Process Studies: Volume > 45 > Issue: 2
Donald Wayne Viney God Almighty and God All-Loving: A Review Article of David Ray Griffin’s God Exists But Gawd Does Not
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
Griffin’s book contributes to the literature of cumulative arguments for God’s existence, revealing the deficiencies of the “God Almighty” of traditional theism (i.e., Gawd) and the strengths of a Whiteheadian process theism (i.e., God). Since the concept of omnipotence is central, it is imperative to note that there are three ideas of divine power in traditional theism, not always carefully parsed by Griffin. Evolutionary theory requires rethinking theism, but, contrary to Griffin, many of the problems posed by the theory are less for belief in Gawd than for fundamentalism. Nevertheless, an interactive dipolar deity fits most naturally with evolutionary thinking to provide a concept of God All-Loving. Griffin is at his best discussing the ground of abstract truths. He does not, however, avail himself of some of the best arguments against traditional theism found in Hartshorne’s work; there is also the question whether Griffin would accept Hartshorne’s idea of the modal coincidence of God’s existence and all possibility and how this would affect his cumulative case.
12. Process Studies: Volume > 5 > Issue: 3
William L. Power Philosophic Logic and Process Theory in the Work of Richard M. Martin: A Review Article