Displaying: 1-20 of 76 documents

0.083 sec

1. ProtoSociology: Volume > 2
Helen Leuninger Language and problems of knowledge
Bookmark and Share
2. ProtoSociology: Volume > 2
Alexander Ulfig Lehrbuch der konstruktiven Wissenschaftstheorie
Bookmark and Share
3. ProtoSociology: Volume > 2
Dirk Martin Dialektik der Kommunikationsgesellschaft
Bookmark and Share
4. ProtoSociology: Volume > 2
Andreas Bauer On social facts
Bookmark and Share
5. ProtoSociology: Volume > 2
Michael Kühnlein Die unsichtbare Religion
Bookmark and Share
6. ProtoSociology: Volume > 2
Angela Mumme Handlungssprache und Sprechhandlung
Bookmark and Share
7. ProtoSociology: Volume > 25
Nikola Kompa Review: Stephen Schiffer, The Things We Mean
Bookmark and Share
8. ProtoSociology: Volume > 3
Dieter Mans Praktische Argumentationstheorie
Bookmark and Share
9. ProtoSociology: Volume > 3
Frank Siebelt The many faces of realism
Bookmark and Share
10. ProtoSociology: Volume > 3
Barbara Brüning Konstruktive Fragelogik
Bookmark and Share
11. ProtoSociology: Volume > 3
Konrad Ott Erklären und Verstehen
Bookmark and Share
12. ProtoSociology: Volume > 3
Christoph Fehige Moralisches Denken
Bookmark and Share
13. ProtoSociology: Volume > 3
Bernhard Miebach Parsons/Pareto/Habermas
Bookmark and Share
14. ProtoSociology: Volume > 3
Gerhard Antos, Josef Schu Elementare Dialogstrukturen
Bookmark and Share
15. ProtoSociology: Volume > 31
William B. Starr Mood, Force and Truth
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
There is a big difference between saying Maya is singing, Is Maya singing? and Sing Maya! This paper examines and criticizes two attempts to rigorously explain this difference: Searle’s speech act theory and the truth-conditional reductionism advocated by Davidson and Lewis. On the speech act analysis, each utterance contains a marker which says what kind of speech act the utterance counts as performing. The truth-conditional reductionists try to reanalyze the non-declaratives (Is Maya singing? and Sing Maya!) as complex declarative forms. The former analysis fails to recognize the indirect relationship between sentence (or clause) type and utterance force. The latter analysis fails to recognize the distinctive and thoroughly compositional contribution that the imperative, interrogative and declarative mood make to sentences containing them.
Bookmark and Share
16. ProtoSociology: Volume > 4
Georg Peter Kosmopolis
Bookmark and Share
17. ProtoSociology: Volume > 4
Erwin Rogier Die Identität von Körper und Geist, Übersetzung und Nachwort von Andreas Kemmerling
Bookmark and Share
18. ProtoSociology: Volume > 4
Dirk Weinreich Recht, Staat, Freiheit - Studien zur Rechtsphilosophie, Staatstheorie und Verfassungsgeschichte
Bookmark and Share
19. ProtoSociology: Volume > 4
Michael Kühnlein Das Ende der Geschichte
Bookmark and Share
20. ProtoSociology: Volume > 4
Manfred Prisching Volkswirtschaftslehre und Analytische Handlnngstheorie. Zur Diagnose, Ätologie und Therapie einer Wissenschaftskrise
Bookmark and Share