Search narrowed by:




Displaying: 1-20 of 72 documents

Show/Hide alternate language

0.21 sec

1. Sententiae: Volume > 41 > Issue: 1
Євгенія Буцикіна Yevheniia Butsykina
Міркування про філософський та етичний метод Арістотеля. Karbowski, J. (2019). Aristotle’s Method in Ethics: Philosophy in Practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
Discourse on the Philosophical and Ethical Method of Aristotle. Karbowski, J. (2019). Aristotle’s Method in Ethics: Philosophy in Practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press

2. Sententiae: Volume > 41 > Issue: 1
Олена Калантарова Олена Калантарова
Буддійська філософія в Індії: від онтології абгідгарми до епістемології праманавади. Westerhoff, J. (2018). The Golden Age of Indian Buddhist Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Буддійська філософія в Індії: від онтології абгідгарми до епістемології праманавади. Westerhoff, J. (2018). The Golden Age of Indian Buddhist Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press

3. Sententiae: Volume > 41 > Issue: 1
Dmytro Sepetyi Дмитро Сепетий
The Problem of Freedom of Will: Historico-philosophical Topics in the Analytic Perspective. Hausmannn, M., & Noller, J. (Eds.). (2021). Free Will. Historical and Analytic Perspectives. Cham: Springer; Palgrave Macmillan.
Проблема свободи волі: історико-філософські сюжети в аналітичній перспективі. Hausmannn, M., & Noller, J. (Eds.). (2021). Free Will. Historical and Analytic Perspectives. Cham: Springer; Palgrave Macmillan

4. Sententiae: Volume > 41 > Issue: 1
Всеволод Кузнецов Vsevolod Kuznetsov
Коментування як жанр. Тегілім. (2020). Тегілім - Псалми. Коментар рабина Шимшона Рафаеля Гірша (Т. І-ІІ). Київ: Дух і Літера
Commenting as a Genre. Tehilim. (2020). Tehilim - Psalms. Commentary by Rabbi Shimshon Raphael Hirsch (Vol. 1-2). Kyiv: Duh i Litera.

5. Sententiae: Volume > 41 > Issue: 1
Олег Хома Oleg Khoma
Чого шукає історик філософії? Marion, J.-L. (2021). Questions cartésiennes III: Descartes sous le masque du cartésianisme. Paris: PUF
What is a Historian of Philosophy Looking For? Marion, J.-L. (2021). Questions cartésiennes III: Descartes sous le masque du cartésianisme. Paris: PUF

6. Sententiae: Volume > 38 > Issue: 2
Володимир Ратніков Volodymyr Ratnikov
Історія філософії науки як галузь філософських досліджень. Stadler, F. (Ed.). (2017). Integrated History and Philosophy of Science: Problems, Perspectives, and Case Studies. (Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook, vol. 20). Vienna: Springer
History and Philosophy of Science as a Field of philosophical Researh. Stadler, F. (Ed.). (2017). Integrated History and Philosophy of Science: Problems, Perspectives, and Case Studies. (Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook, vol. 20). Vienna: Springer

7. Sententiae: Volume > 38 > Issue: 2
Євген Скопов Evgen Scopov
Історія «маленької людини». (Немчинов, І. (2019). Малининъ/ Малінін: Реконструкція «втраченої біографії» київського професора. Вінниця: ФОП Барановська Т.П.)
The history of the Little Man. (Nemchinov, I. (2019). Malinin / Malinin: Reconstruction of the "lost biography" of Kiev professor. Vinnitsa: FOP Baranovskaya TP)

8. Sententiae: Volume > 38 > Issue: 2
Олег Хома Oleg Khoma
Сучасне глобальне декартознавство. Nadler, S. et al (2019). The Oxford Handbook of Descartes and Cartesianism. Oxford: Oxford UP.
Contemporary global Descartes studies. Nadler, S. et al (2019). The Oxford Handbook of Descartes and Cartesianism. Oxford: Oxford UP

9. Sententiae: Volume > 38 > Issue: 2
Владислав Артюшенко Vladislav Artiushenko
Ричард Бет. Як бути Пірроністом?Bett, R. (2019). How to Be a Pyrrhonist: The Practice and Significance of Pyrrhonian Skepticism. Cambridge: Cambridge UP
Richard Bett. How to Be a Pyrrhonist. Bett, R. (2019). How to Be a Pyrrhonist: The Practice and Significance of Pyrrhonian Skepticism. Cambridge: Cambridge UP

10. Sententiae: Volume > 38 > Issue: 2
Поліна Коржикова Polina Korzhikova
Данкан Ларж та ін. Неперекладність: міждисциплінарні перспективи. Large, D., Akashi, M., Józwikowska, W., & Rose, E. (2019). Untranslatability: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Routledge: New York.
Duncan Large et al., Untranslatability: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Large, D., Akashi, M., Józwikowska, W., & Rose, E. (2019). Untranslatability: Interdiscipli-nary Perspectives. Routledge: New York

11. Sententiae: Volume > 38 > Issue: 2
Ельвіра Чухрай Elvira Chukhray
Cенс життя і великі філософи. Leach, S., & Tartaglia, J. (2018). The Meaning of Life and the Great Philosophers. Routledge: London, & New York.
The Meaning of Life and the Great Philosophers. Leach, S., & Tartaglia, J. (2018). The Meaning of Life and the Great Philosophers. Routledge: London, & New York

12. Sententiae: Volume > 40 > Issue: 2
Павло Бартусяк Pavlo Bartusiak
Стоїцизм Дельоза. Jonhson, R. J. (2020). Deleuze, a Stoic. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Deleuze’s Stoicism. Jonhson, R. J. (2020). Deleuze, a Stoic. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

13. Sententiae: Volume > 40 > Issue: 2
Юрій Завгородній Yurii Zavhorodnii
Класична індійська філософія в оксфордській серії «Історія філософії без жодних прогалин»: Adamson, P., & Ganeri, J. (2020). Classical Indian Philosophy: a History of Philosophy Without any Gaps, Volume 5
Classical Indian Philosophy in the Oxford series "History of Philosophy without any Gaps"

14. Sententiae: Volume > 40 > Issue: 2
Ігор Карівець Ihor Karivets
Деконструкція та реконструкція поняття дг’яна: стратегії та перспективи: Данилов, Д. (2020). Трансформація поняття «дг’яна» у вченні йоґи. Київ: Дух і Літера
Deconstruction and Reconstruction of the Dhyāna Concept: Strategies and Perspectives

15. Sententiae: Volume > 40 > Issue: 2
Олександр Корнієнко Olexandr Kornienko
У пошуках ідентичності (Історико-філософський аналіз арабської думки): Corm, G. (2020). Arab Political Thought: Past and Present. London: Hurst & Company
In Search of Identity (Historical and Philosophical Analysis of Arab Thought)

16. Sententiae: Volume > 40 > Issue: 2
Олег Хома Oleg Khoma
"Аристократична метафізика" і стереотипи: Jolibert, B. (2020). Descartes en questions: l'urgence d'un retour aux textes. Paris: L'Harmattan
"Aristocratic Metaphysics" and Stereotypes

17. Sententiae: Volume > 40 > Issue: 1
Віктор Чорний Victor Chorny
Присутність у широкому теперішньому: умбрехт, Г. У. (2020). Продукування присутності. Що значення не може передати. Харків: IST Publishing
"Presence" in the Broad Present

abstract | view |  rights & permissions
This review of the Ukrainian translation of H. U. Gumbrecht’s best-known work brings out the strengths and weaknesses of the translation and the peculiar reception of Gumbrecht’s key ideas (“presence” and “the broad present”) in Ukraine. It also critically assesses Gumbrecht’s own original and often contradictory points. I question the relevance of Gumrecht’s meaning / presence distinction for reconstructing the history of the philosophical tradition, as well as for analysing our complex relation to the world. I also demonstrate the weakness of his biased attempts to paint his opponents as relativists. Besides, I contrast Gumbrecht’s meaning / presence dualism with John Dewey’s theory of experience. The latter conceives experience as a dialectical relation between “doing” and “undergoing”. This juxtaposition shows that Gumbrecht’s theory cannot give a satisfactory account of the mechanisms of everyday or aesthetic experience due to its lack of consistent “everyday” epistemology. Moreover, his vague concept of “presence” and its unequivocal appraisal conflict with his own concept of the chronotope of “broad” or “complex” present, as presented in the selected essays of The Time Is Out of Joint. Eventually, I conclude that Gumbrecht’s eclectic terminological apparatus, as well as uncritical and biased reconstruction of the tradition preclude any serious philosophical engagement. However, it does not undermine the significance of his particular insights and theoretical instruments (such as “the broad present”) for cultural analysis.
18. Sententiae: Volume > 40 > Issue: 1
Юрій Чорноморець Yuriy Chornomorets
Нові спроби відродити український неотомізм через інспірацію перекладами: Роздуми над книгою Кромпєц, М. (2020). Чому зло? Київ: Кайрос.
New Attempts to Revive Ukrainian neo-Thomism through Inspiration-by-translations

abstract | view |  rights & permissions
One of the unsolved problems for the historical and philosophical thought of Ukraine is the lack of reflection on the phenomenon of Ukrainian neo-Thomism. Today, there has not been reconstructed the history of this trend, which had been actively developing in the interwar Western Ukraine since the time of socio-ethical letters by Andrei Sheptytsky in the early XX century, gained new connotations in the diaspora from 1940s to 1990s, and acquired new forms in Roman Catholic thought in Ukraine at the beginning of the XXI century. Moreover, a comprehensive historical and philosophical assessment of the achievements and shortcomings of Ukrainian neo-Thomism at different stages of its development has not been made. Meanwhile, Ukrainian neo-Thomism is experiencing a crisis, which it is trying to overcome by translating controversial works devoted mainly to the history of moral theology. The main feature of the proposed works is the oscillation between the need to recognize the presence of a person’s spiritual-intellectual and moral-volitional intuitions and the reluctance to recognize it openly, because it would be contrary to the very principles of Thomism. Modern Ukrainian neo-Thomism inherits this contradiction, and therefore the choice of classic books for translation reflects the dialectic of the struggle of different tendencies, which objectively cannot contribute to the legitimization of neo-Thomism in the Ukrainian philosophical discourse. Especially significant in this regard was the translation of the book by the classic of Polish neo-Thomism Mieczysław Krąmpiec “Why Evil?”, because this monograph shows the contradiction of neo-Thomistic thought in the key issues about the possibility of person’s moral intuition, moral responsibility and dignity. The refusal of Krąmpiec to recognize the existence of a person’s spiritual-intellectual and moral-volitional intuitions, despite all the prerequisites for such recognition, is a faulre of this monograph and Krąmpiec is not able to answer the question stated in its title. All this justifies that in the time of Pope Benedict XVI and Pope Francis, moral theology and social doctrine moved to neo-Augustinianism, which recognizes that the person has spiritual-intellectual and moral-volitional intuitions.
19. Sententiae: Volume > 40 > Issue: 1
Андрій Богачов Andriy Bogachov
Гайдеґер і феноменологія. Westerlund, F. (2020). Heidegger and the Problem of Phenomena. London: Bloomsbury.
Heidegger and Phenomenology. Westerlund, F. (2020). Heidegger and the Problem of Phenomena. London: Bloomsbury.

abstract | view |  rights & permissions
Review of Westerlund, F. (2020). Heidegger and the Problem of Phenomena. London: Bloomsbury.
20. Sententiae: Volume > 40 > Issue: 1
Ілля Давіденко Illia Davidenko
Тенденції сучасного геґелезнавства. Bykova, M., Westphal, K., et al. (2020). The Palgrave Hegel Handbook. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan
Trends in Modern Hegelean Studies. Bykova, M., Westphal, K., et al. (2020). The Palgrave Hegel Handbook. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan

abstract | view |  rights & permissions
Review of Bykova, M., Westphal, K., et al. (2020). The Palgrave Hegel Handbook. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.