Narrow search


By category:

By publication type:

By language:

By journals:

By document type:


Displaying: 1-10 of 15 documents

0.068 sec

1. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 1 > Issue: 3/4
Gabriel Cercel Fenomenologia între Bewusstsein şi Dasein Note pe marginea unei noi interpretări
2. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 1 > Issue: 3/4
Mihail Neamţu „Născut, iar nu făcut“ Note despre filozofia Revelaţiei la Michel Henry
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
This paper guides the Romanian reader through a variety of discussions surrounding the central themes of Michel Henry’s latest books (C’est moi la Vérité,1996; Incarnation, 2000). Basically, it aims to present the principles of the phenomenology of Life in Henry’s thought, focusing on the status of the apparition, and of truth, both of which are to be understood not as the ontic relation of adaequatio, but as the self-revelation of Life in the immanence of each non-intentional experience. My review-article draws upon the problem of the ‘original impression’, a crucial stage in shifting the theme of the ‘transcendental body’ and of the ‘self-affection’. At this point, my interpretation suggests that Henry’s phenomenology of affection would require further stark distinctions like the one between the ‘corporeal pain’ and the ‘transcendental sufferance’, very significant from the Christian viewpoint, too. I also try to suggest the importance of Henry’s phenomenology of Life for a radical understanding of bioethics. In addition, I tackle Michel Henry’s strong critique of the autistic sexual love, which sounds strikingly similarly to those raised up, respectively, by S. Kierkegaard and J.-L. Marion. Eventually, my essential claim is that one should reconsider very seriously the importance of the Christian mystical theology (best represented by the Patristic tradition) in order to get an adequate understanding of Michel Henry’s radical phenomenology of Life.
3. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 11
Eric Pommier La phénoménologie de la vie de Renaud Barbaras
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
Renaud Barbaras wants to show that only the concept of life can help us understand how the subject may be a condition as well as a part of the world. The failures of the former phenomenological theories on this point is due to “the ontology of death” they assume, which leads to separate the conscience and the body. It is thus required to realise an epochè of death so as to think the unity of the subject. Ultimately, Renaud Barbaras is led to define life from desire.
4. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 2 > Issue: 3/4
Ion Tănăsescu Intenţionalitatea în exegeza brentaniană schiţa unei polemici
5. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 2 > Issue: 3/4
Victor Popescu Persoană, valori şi afectivitate scheler – o fenomenologie în răspăr
6. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 3 > Issue: 3/4
Cristian Ciocan Notes sur deux tentatives de totalisation: La phénoménologie et le projet encyclopédique
7. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 3 > Issue: 3/4
Paul Marinescu Adevǎr şi istorie: Enigma Reprezentǎrii Trecutului
8. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 3 > Issue: 3/4
Attila Szigeti L’œuvre de Lévinas entre phénoménologie, éthique et philosophie du judaïsme: Notes sur la réception anglo-saxonne d’un «perfectionniste moral»
9. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 3 > Issue: 3/4
Delia Popa La pratique de la phénoménologie radicale: Rolf Kühn et Michel Henry
10. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 4 > Issue: 1/2
Delia Popa Advenir à soi-même à partir de ce qui excède Claude Romano et l’aventure du sens
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
The three books recently published by C. Romano reconsider the phenomenological senses of world and time starting from the event as original phenomena. This review-article explores the new method that he propose, called “evenimential hermeneutics”, as applied to the relation to ourselves, to the world and to the general sense of being. These analyses lean upon an original way of thinking time, as born in each “sudden” moment. The paper also draws comparisons with Heidegger, Husserl and Lévinas, while proposing a critical point of view on Romano’s thesis, concerning the relationship between the novelty of the event and the past, and its relation with desire and otherness.