Displaying: 1-20 of 3956 documents

0.089 sec

1. International Philosophical Quarterly: Volume > 50 > Issue: 1
Richard White Schopenhauer and Indian Philosophy: On the Limits of Comparative Thought
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
Schopenhauer was one of the first Western philosophers to appreciate the significance of Indian philosophy. He comments on “the admirable agreement” between his own thought and the teachings of Buddhism, and he praises the wisdom of the Upanishads as among the most profound productions of the human mind. But how accurate is his grasp of Indian philosophy? In this essay I focus on three significant points of comparison: compassion, the illusory nature of the individual, and the value of life. To what extent are these themes shared by Schopenhauer and Indian philosophy? To what extent is Schopenhauer’s account at odds with prevailing Indian views? Schopenhauer’s philosophy raises significant questions concerning the limits of cross-cultural appropriation and encounter.
Bookmark and Share
2. International Philosophical Quarterly: Volume > 50 > Issue: 2
David J. Zoller Basic Concepts of Aristotelian Philosophy
Bookmark and Share
3. International Philosophical Quarterly: Volume > 50 > Issue: 2
Stephen Chamberlain The Inner Word in Gadamer’s Hermeneutics
Bookmark and Share
4. International Philosophical Quarterly: Volume > 50 > Issue: 2
Joseph W. Koterski, S.J. Incapacity and Care: Controversies in Healthcare and Research
Bookmark and Share
5. International Philosophical Quarterly: Volume > 50 > Issue: 2
Barry David Inner Grace: Augustine in the Traditions of Plato and Paul
Bookmark and Share
6. International Philosophical Quarterly: Volume > 50 > Issue: 2
Theresa Weynand Tobin Toward an Epistemology of Mysticism: Knowing God as Mystery
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
While some philosophers suggest that mystical experience may provide evidence for belief in God, skeptics doubt that there is adequate warrant for even accepting the claim of a mystical experience as evidence for anything, except perhaps for some kind of mental instability. Drawing from the work of Gabriel Marcel, I argue that the pervasive philosophical skepticism about the evidential status of mystical experiences is misguided because it rests on too narrow a view about ways of knowing and about what can count as evidence for belief in the divine. I illustrate the advantages of Marcel’s approach by applying it to the respective spiritual journeys of Augustine of Hippo and Abu Hamid Muhammad al-Ghazali. I then argue that Marcel’s framework improves on contemporary analytic approaches because it captures more accurately the kind of knowledge that mystical experiences convey as reported by the subjects who claim to have them.
Bookmark and Share
7. International Philosophical Quarterly: Volume > 50 > Issue: 2
Phillip Honenberger Ethics, Hermeneutics, and Eudaimonics
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
Contemporary ethical theory ought to take both the biological and cultural constitution of human subjects into account. But the coupling of these constraints raises questions about the scope of each. In this paper I defend the view that, rather than predetermining human moral sensibility, or founding a universal ethic on that basis, the biological constitution of human beings actually prefigures their wide variability across cultures and argues for the open-endedness of questions of meaning and value. I defend this conception against Owen Flanagan’s neo-Darwinian “Eudaimonics” as well as against various forms of ethical a priorism and ethical skepticism, making critical use of Charles Taylor’s hermeneutic conception of human moral valuation.
Bookmark and Share
8. International Philosophical Quarterly: Volume > 50 > Issue: 2
David F. Horkott Machiavelli’s Ethics
Bookmark and Share
9. International Philosophical Quarterly: Volume > 50 > Issue: 2
Steven G. Smith Intrinsic Value, Goodness, and the Appeals of Things
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
“Intrinsic value” is a perplexing notion in that it purports to establish a relationship with a thing that cannot in fact be established by the valuing subject butcan only be welcomed. An important sense of “good” expresses the non-axiological side of shared flourishing. We do need the concept of intrinsic value to put our different kinds of value in order, but we can also recognize that the positing of intrinsic value is grounded on events of appeal wherein perceived beings promise distinctive forms of benign partnership with their perceivers. The ideal of appeal maximalism can displace the problematic ideal of unrestricted intrinsic value as a basis for expanding the circle of moral consideration.
Bookmark and Share
10. International Philosophical Quarterly: Volume > 50 > Issue: 2
Katherine E. Kirby The Hero and Asymmetrical Obligation: Levinas and Ricoeur in Dialogue
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
In defending Levinas’s ethical theory against Ricoeur’s objections in Oneself as Another, I make a two-fold argument in regard to heroic action and the ordinary ethical relation. First, I suggest a definition of the hero as she who does what is right—that is, what is ethically necessary or obligatory—even when it requires extreme sacrifice. Second, I argue that the development of virtuous character, out of which such heroic action comes, is dependent upon the asymmetrical relation between an alterior Other and a self who is willing to sacrifice to do what is right. Re-orienting oneself toward the ethical relation is, itself, a sacrifice, requiring that one adopt a non-reciprocal, asymmetrical devotion to the Other. Thus, ethics, including both heroic and ordinary ethical behavior, ought not be founded on notions of friendship, symmetry, or mutuality, but rather on absolute difference, asymmetry, and self-sacrifice.
Bookmark and Share
11. International Philosophical Quarterly: Volume > 50 > Issue: 2
Books Received
Bookmark and Share
12. International Philosophical Quarterly: Volume > 50 > Issue: 2
Raymond Dennehy The Moral Fool: A Case for Amorality
Bookmark and Share
13. International Philosophical Quarterly: Volume > 50 > Issue: 2
About Our Contributors
Bookmark and Share
14. International Philosophical Quarterly: Volume > 50 > Issue: 2
Michael Wenisch The Epistemological Roots of the Dispute over Time and Freedom in the Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
Historians and philosophers of science commonly ignore the epistemological disagreement about the theoretical limits of rationality that underlies the disputes over the absoluteness or relationality of time and the true nature of divine freedom in the Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence. Accordingly, I explore both the logical interconnectedness and the deeper philosophical roots of these disputes, with a view to evaluating the contrast in Leibniz’s and Clarke’s underlying notions of the limits of rationality. In tracing this contrast, I attempt to show first that Clarke’s position can be used to demonstrate successfully that Leibniz’s concept of divine freedom, and his use of the Principle of Sufficient Reason to justify it, involves a contradiction. Second, I attempt to demonstrate that the concept of the limits of rationality underlying Clarke’s conception of divine freedom can be successfully defended against Leibniz’s attacks.
Bookmark and Share
15. International Philosophical Quarterly: Volume > 50 > Issue: 2
Daniel J. Kirchner Augustine’s Use of Epicureanism: Three Paradigmatic Problems for a Theory of Friendship in the Confessions
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
The patristic tradition has long censured or denied debts to Epicurean thought. Thus it is surprising to find that Augustine requires and uses Epicurean arguments at three moments in the Confessions essential his theory of friendship: the pear tree incident, the death of his friend, and the decision not to form a philosophical community. I argue that the classical definition of friendship is inadequate to solve these problems. Furthermore, reworking Augustine’s theory of friendship with the use/enjoyment doctrine developed in The Trinity fails to resolve them. Thus the problems raised in the Confessions cannot be exposed or solved through Augustine’s own theoretical framework. I argue that they are, however, central to the Epicurean theory of friendship, which addresses them specifically, and that the Epicurean insistence on the mortality of the soul produces the central problem for Augustine’s notion of friendship.
Bookmark and Share
16. International Philosophical Quarterly: Volume > 50 > Issue: 3
Robert Piercey Metaphilosophy as First Philosophy
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
This paper describes and evaluates two different ways of doing philosophy: a “reflexive” approach that sees metaphilosophical inquiry as fundamental, and a “nonreflexive” approach that sees metaphilosophy as dispensable. It examines arguments that have been advanced for these approaches by Gilbert Ryle, Jerry Fodor, and Richard Rorty, and claims that none of these arguments are convincing. Finally, the paper draws on Alasdair MacIntyre’s work to propose a different way of choosing between the approaches, one that asks which approach is more successful at making its appeal intelligible to the other. From this perspective, the reflexive approach appears to have an important advantage over its rival.
Bookmark and Share
17. International Philosophical Quarterly: Volume > 50 > Issue: 3
Joseph W. Koterski, S.J. The Creative Retrieval of St. Thomas Aquinas: Essays in Thomistic Philosophy, New and Old
Bookmark and Share
18. International Philosophical Quarterly: Volume > 50 > Issue: 3
Michael W. Tkacz Moral Dilemmas of Modern War: Torture, Assassination, and Blackmail in an Age of Asymmetric Conflict
Bookmark and Share
19. International Philosophical Quarterly: Volume > 50 > Issue: 3
Jacek Poznański, S.J. Filozoficzne interpretacje faktów naukowych [The Philosophical Interpretations of Scientific Facts]
Bookmark and Share
20. International Philosophical Quarterly: Volume > 50 > Issue: 3
Douglas Low Hegel and Merleau-Ponty on Modernism and Postmodernism
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
This essay attempts to provide detailed evidence for Charles Taylor’s claim that both Hegel and Merleau-Ponty follow Kant’s refutation of idealism in an effort to take a stand against Modernism’s claim that human knowledge of the world is reducible to a conceptual representation of it. For both the Hegel of Phenomenology of Mind and Merleau-Ponty throughout his career, human consciousness and knowledge must embrace and make sense of a world that is always already there. This stand will be made against Postmodernism as well.
Bookmark and Share