Displaying: 1-10 of 141 documents

0.032 sec

1. Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie: Volume > 41 > Issue: 4
Pierre-Yves Bonin Le retour de la méritocratie: la théorie de la justice sociale de David Miller
2. Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie: Volume > 41 > Issue: 4
Stéphane Courtois Le patriotisme constitutionnel de J. Habermas face au nationalisme québécois: sa portée, ses limites
3. Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie: Volume > 41 > Issue: 4
Richard Bodéüs Le commentaire entre tradition et innovation
4. Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie: Volume > 41 > Issue: 4
Patricia Nourry Pascal. Qu’est-ce que la vérité?
5. Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie: Volume > 41 > Issue: 4
Sébastien Charles Berkeley’s Principles and Dialogues. Background Source Materials
6. Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie: Volume > 41 > Issue: 4
Jeffrey Reid Kant et la genèse de la subjectivité esthétique. Esthétique et philosophie avant la Critique de la faculté de juger
7. Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie: Volume > 43 > Issue: 2
Daniel Laurier La publicité et l’interdépendance du langage et de la pensée
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
ABSTRACT: I clarify in what sense one might want to claim that thought or language are public. I distinguish among four forms that each of these claims might take, and two general ways of establishing them that might be contemplated. The first infers the public character of thought from the public character of language, and the second infers the latter from the former. I show that neither of these stategies seems to be able to dispense with the claim that thought and language are interdependent, and that the second strategy raises more difficulties than the first. I then examine the reasoning by which Davidson means to establish that thought depends on language. I claim that this reasoning is not conclusive, and that it can be adapted in such a way as to establish aversion of the thesis that thought is public which does not presuppose that language is public, and aversion of the thesis that language is public which does not imply that thought depends on language. I conclude with the suggestion that despite appearances to the contrary Davidson’s doctrine is defensible only if it implies at least the conceivability of intentional systems that would lack language altogether.
8. Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie: Volume > 43 > Issue: 2
Yvon LaFrance Platon: les formes intelligibles. Sur la forme intelligible et la participation dans les dialogues platoniciens
9. Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie: Volume > 43 > Issue: 2
Yvon Gauthier Entre science et réalité. La Construction sociale de quoi?
10. Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie: Volume > 43 > Issue: 2
Marco Bélanger La honte est-elle immorale?