Narrow search


By category:

By publication type:

By language:

By journals:

By document type:


Displaying: 1-20 of 119 documents

0.064 sec

1. Eco-ethica: Volume > 3
Lars Hertzberg Nature is Dead, Long Live The Environment!
2. Eco-ethica: Volume > 3
Rebecka Lettevall The nature of war and the culture of peace
3. Eco-ethica: Volume > 3
Peter Kemp, Noriko Hashimoto Preface
4. Eco-ethica: Volume > 3
Richard Kearney Translating across Faith Cultures: Radical Hospitality
5. Eco-ethica: Volume > 3
Bengt Kristensson Uggla Ricœur’s History: The Historical Horizon in Paul Ricœur’s Philosophical Project
6. Eco-ethica: Volume > 3
Manuel B. Dy, Jr. The Confucian Golden Rule in Times of Poverty and Affluence
7. Eco-ethica: Volume > 3
Jacob Dahl Rendtorff Ethics after Fukushima!: Reflections on Institutional Decision-Making in Complex Organizational Systems
8. Eco-ethica: Volume > 3
Peter McCormick Internationalizing Law and Human Contingency: On Mireille Delmas-Marty and Paul Ricœur
9. Eco-ethica: Volume > 3
Noriko Hashimoto Conflicts between Environmental Philosophy and Cultural Problems
10. Eco-ethica: Volume > 3
Robert Bernasconi Kant and the Distinction between Nature and Culture: Its Role in Recent Defenses of His Cosmopolitanism
11. Eco-ethica: Volume > 3
The Authors / Les Auteurs
12. Eco-ethica: Volume > 3
David Rasmussen Public Reason and Democratic Culture
13. Eco-ethica: Volume > 3
Peter Kemp, Noriko Hashimoto Editorial
14. Eco-ethica: Volume > 3
Jacob Dahl Rendtorff Paul Ricoeur on Philosophy and Theology
15. Eco-ethica: Volume > 3
Peter McCormick Limited Sovereignties?
16. Eco-ethica: Volume > 4
Peter McCormick Essential Sovereignties?: Political, Ethical, and Personal
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
Politics and ethics are closely linked in many ways. One such link is the central but still contentious notion of the person. Take the case of today’s European Union. Most basically, member states disagree on what and who persons are. This EU paradox may be resolved when political debates about sovereignty’s limits expand to include ethical discussions of the nature of persons. The aim of this paper is to point in the direction of an account of the person that will support proper understandings of those ethical, and not just political, values that the Preamble of any eventual European Union constitution will need to entrench tomorrow.
17. Eco-ethica: Volume > 4
Peter Kemp, Noriko Hashimoto Editorial
18. Eco-ethica: Volume > 4
Noriko Hashimoto Negative Technology and Solidarity: An Essay on the Development from Ethics to Politics
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
A characteristic feature of the 21st century is that every important thing is invisible: boundaries, technological risk, global warming, etc. In Eco-ethica, a new ethics in contrast to Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics must be developed with respect to these invisible realities. What should we do to demolish the nuclear facilities at Fukushima? This is a question of “technica negativa”, the invisible process of demolition. The problem must be examined through ethics, Kant’s legal thinking and, finally, politics. Habermas’ idea of “solidarity” is fruitful here because he insists on civic democracy at a transnational scale. This idea may be linked to a new form of cosmopolitanism.
19. Eco-ethica: Volume > 4
Peter Kemp Ricœur’s Reticence with Regard to Kierkegaard
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
This paper tries to answer the question: why did Paul Ricœur keep a nearly total silence after 1963 about Soren Kierkegaard, and was there from the beginning a reticence with regard to Kierkegaard? An answer can be found in the beginning of Ricœur’s work, in his first book written with Mikel Dufrenne on Karl Jaspers et la philosophie de I ’existence. This book that is full of references to Kierkegaard also shows that it was Jaspers’ particular appropriation of the Danish thinker that affected him. But, like Jaspers, Ricœur became too preoccupied with external historical, social and political life to be a true disciple of Kierkegaard.
20. Eco-ethica: Volume > 4
Pierre-Olivier Monteil Paradoxes in Ricœur’s Political Thinking
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
Paul Ricœur is rarely considered as a political thinker by his commentators. However, the question of power is constantly present in his thinking. The paper aims at retracing the main lines of Ricœur’s political project. Being instructed by the twentieth century totalitarianisms, he attacks systematicism in politics with “systematicity”, relying on the strength of political paradoxes. This argumentative form invites us to renounce claiming a knowledge and to connect politics with ethics through a practical wisdom. Ricœur’s reflection gives us keys for understanding today’s politics. His criticism of “minimal policies” may in particular be addressed to neoliberalism.