Narrow search

By category:

By publication type:

By language:

By journals:

By document type:

Displaying: 1-10 of 122 documents

0.084 sec

1. Schutzian Research: Volume > 5
Kseniya Dmytrenko Nachfolge der transzendentalen und mundanen Phänomenologie als Voraussetzung empirisch phänomenologischer Forschung
abstract | view |  rights & permissions
In the background of accelerated interdisciplinary development of phenomenology, there appears more clearly a deficiency of the epistemological groundingand methodological explanation of present research. This is particularly evident in the field of social phenomenology, in which the research positions extend fromthat of the “orthodox” transcendental phenomenologists to an endless search for a new foundation for pragmatic social phenomenology in philosophical anthropology, to a vague thesis about “fruitful discussion” between E. Husserl and A. Schutz. The main task of this article consists in the establishment of the fundamental significance of the epistemological succession between Husserl’s transcendental phenomenology and Schutz’s natural phenomenology. This confirms itself through the analysis of such concepts as sense and constitution, which play the prominent methodological role in the main works – Ideas-I and correspondingly The Phenomenology of the Social World. Such comparative analysis allows not only to highlight the most important similarities in the projects of both thinkers such as a “sense-giving function” of consciousness, but also to distinguish small deviations of the mundane phenomenology from the transcendental project, i.e., the rejection of transcendental reductions and the “pragmatic conditioning” of the subjective action’s sense through now- and so-states of the ego. It is proposed to interpret the famous Schutzian “turning away from Husserl” first of all as a skeptical turn; however, that does not mean that the essential transcendental prerequisites such as a correlation of “attitude – experience – world” should be abandoned. In the end, it is demonstrated that the main metaphysical statements of Husserl can still retain their value within the framework of the contemporary conventional research models such as the “scientific research program” by I. Lakatos, whereas further theoretical statements, i.e., of social phenomenology, can be bound with this “hard core” as “auxiliary hypotheses” in cooperation with empirical sciences.
2. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 1 > Issue: 1/2
Rudolf Bernet Verschiedene Begriffe der Logik und ihr Bezug auf die Subjektivität
3. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 1 > Issue: 1/2
Gabriel Cercel Die Faktizität der Hermeneutik: Zu Gadamers Auslegung des Heideggerschen Frühdenkens im Hinblick auf die heutige Heidegger-Exegese
4. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 1 > Issue: 1/2
Lukas Marcel Vosicky Vom Sprung in den Ab-Grund des Nichts: Zu einer entfernten Annäherung an die Frage nach Gott
5. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 1 > Issue: 1/2
Gabriel Liiceanu, Thomas Kleininger Heideggers Rezeption in Rumänien (1931-1987)
6. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 1 > Issue: 3/4
Walter Biemel Zur Gründung des Kölner Husserl-Archivs. Die Bedeutung eines Traumes
7. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 1 > Issue: 3/4
Marion Heinz Philosophie und Weltanschauung: Die Formierung von Heideggers Philosophiebegriff in Auseinandersetzung mit der badischen Schule des Neukantianismus
8. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 1 > Issue: 3/4
Michael Staudigl Die Grenzen der Zeit. Bemerkungen zum Status der Materialität in der Phänomenologie Husserls
9. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 1 > Issue: 3/4
Mădălina Diaconu Ein Versuch über den Geruch. Überlegungen zur Durchführbarkeit einer phänomenologischen Ästhetik der Olfaktorik
10. Studia Phaenomenologica: Volume > 1 > Issue: 3/4
Friedrich-Wilhelm von Herrmann Gottsuche Und Selbstauslegung. Das X. Buch der Confessiones des Heiligen Augustinus im Horizont von Heideggers Hermeneutischer Phänomenologie des faktischen Lebens