Already a subscriber? - Login here
Not yet a subscriber? - Subscribe here

Browse by:



Displaying: 1-20 of 26 documents


1. Philotheos: Volume > 9
Jörg Splett

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Bookmark and Share

2. Philotheos: Volume > 9
Wolfgang Speyer

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Bookmark and Share

3. Philotheos: Volume > 9
Татьяна Григорьевна Человенко

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Bookmark and Share

4. Philotheos: Volume > 9
Christos Terezis, Kalomoira Polychronopoulou

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Bookmark and Share

5. Philotheos: Volume > 9
Mostafa Younesie

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Bookmark and Share

6. Philotheos: Volume > 9
Jean-Michel Charrue

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Bookmark and Share

7. Philotheos: Volume > 9
Vladan Perišić

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Bookmark and Share

8. Philotheos: Volume > 9
Milosav Vešović, Noel Putnik

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Bookmark and Share

9. Philotheos: Volume > 9
Zoran Djurović

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Bookmark and Share

10. Philotheos: Volume > 9
Jovan Milanović

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Bookmark and Share

11. Philotheos: Volume > 9
Anita Strezova

abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
This article explores the fundamental Christological principles discussed by Byzantine iconophile writers of the eight and ninth centuries, John of Damascus (675-749), Theodore the Studite (759-826) and Patriarch Nikephoros I of Constantinople (758-828). Within the larger context of theological concerns, the iconophile focus their attention on two key points: (a) the notion of the hypostatic union of human and divine natures in Christ; and (b) the properties of circumscription and uncircumscribability. These Christological aspects play critical part in supporting the main objective of iconophiles, the defense of Chalcedonian formulation, of which the theoretical justification of Christ’s pictorial representation is simply one part, albeit a central one. In support to their theological cause, the iconophiles also make recourse to the distinction between nature and hypostasis and devote an important part of their exposition for the holy images on the dogmatic significance of the Incarnation.
Bookmark and Share

12. Philotheos: Volume > 9
Stamatios D. Gerogiorgakis

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Bookmark and Share

13. Philotheos: Volume > 9
Katelis Viglas

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Bookmark and Share

14. Philotheos: Volume > 9
Branko Gorgiev

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Bookmark and Share

15. Philotheos: Volume > 9
Monk Romilo of Hilandar

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Bookmark and Share

16. Philotheos: Volume > 9
Alois M. Haas

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Bookmark and Share

17. Philotheos: Volume > 9
Ben Lazare Mijušković

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Bookmark and Share

18. Philotheos: Volume > 9
Richard Wisser

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Bookmark and Share

19. Philotheos: Volume > 9
Сергей С. Хоружий

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Bookmark and Share

20. Philotheos: Volume > 9
М. А. Маслин

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Bookmark and Share