>> Go to Current Issue

Philosophy Today

Volume 60, Issue 4, Fall 2016
Special Topic: History, Today

Table of Contents

Already a subscriber? - Login here
Not yet a subscriber? - Subscribe here

Browse by:



Displaying: 1-10 of 19 documents


special topic: history, today
1. Philosophy Today: Volume > 60 > Issue: 4
Marcia Sá Cavalcante Schuback, Jean-Luc Nancy History, Today
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
2. Philosophy Today: Volume > 60 > Issue: 4
Jean-Luc Nancy, Marcia Sá Cavalcante Schuback, Peter Hanly History Improvised: A Short Dialogue between Jean-Luc Nancy and Marcia Sá Cavalcante Schuback
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
In this text, a dialogue about the difficult task of seizing the sense of history today is presented. The point of departure is the difficulty of the times to begin and the necessity to rethink the difference between historiography and historicity, and further between events, the event and the advent. The dialogue proposes to revisit the meaning of beginning from out the experience of improvisation and to reflect upon the possibility of developing improvisation as a sense of history.
3. Philosophy Today: Volume > 60 > Issue: 4
Werner Hamacher, Peter Hanly En-counterings of Time
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
The text tries to make plausible the necessity in every thought of time to think an un-time—a 'field' without the form of time that only allows for conceiving of time as a form.
4. Philosophy Today: Volume > 60 > Issue: 4
Alexander García Düttmann The Hopeless
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
This paper discusses hope and hopelessness in relation to history. It does so by turning to Benjamin’s famous statement that hope exists only for the hopeless, and to Derrida’s late thoughts on solitude and the world.
5. Philosophy Today: Volume > 60 > Issue: 4
Peter Trawny, Ian Alexander Moore, Christoper Turner Fragments on the Philosophy of History
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Philosophy of History is in crisis. This crisis has a structural origin in separating a finitude of the one (fate, destiny, nation, people, identity) from an infinitude of the many (individuals, biographies, contingencies, banalities). This difference seems to produce an aporia. Where could history be that would talk of both?
6. Philosophy Today: Volume > 60 > Issue: 4
Jean-Luc Nancy, Peter Hanly Beni Vacanti
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
There is no heritage.
7. Philosophy Today: Volume > 60 > Issue: 4
Aïcha Liviana Messina, Lena Taub The Apocalypse of Blanchot
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
The thoughts of apocalypse can either be intense and demanding, or lead to the risk of abandoning the present to a state of inertia and impotence. The apocalypse can be, in fact, the moment of the Last Judgment. In this case, justice is related to the revelation of truth. But the apocalypse can also be the revelation of the end of any truth, i.e. the revelation that the history doesn’t have any meaning, that the end is as endless as it is hopeless. This article takes up “the apocalypse of Blanchot.” It shows that by thinking that the apocalypse has always already occurred, history is not what leads to an end, but is rather the responsibility to an endless end. In that sense, for Blanchot, history is not the redemption of contingency as eternity; rather, what must be historicized is the eternity of the end.
8. Philosophy Today: Volume > 60 > Issue: 4
Tatsuya Nishiyama Facticity and Poietics in History: Miki Kiyoshi’s Reading of Heidegger
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Modern Japanese thinkers tried to understand “history” as processes of translation through which the Japanese culture/society/nation integrated itself into world history. This paper analyzes Miki Kiyoshi’s (1897-1945) Philosophy of History [1932], a prominent example of such an approach to history. His understanding of history is deeply influenced by Martin Heidegger’s thoughts about facticity. The most essential part of Miki’s notion of “history” lies in his practico-poietic conception of history, which is elaborated through his own interpretation of Heidegger (via Marx). This paper attempts to investigate how Miki developed such a practico-poietic theory as well as how he was faced with its limit, not only on a theoretical level, but also in the specific historical contexts in the 1930s and 1940s. To seek answers to these questions enables us to understand why Miki came to re-create philosophical discourse to describe the space of history in approaching the question of translation, that is, the question concerning the transformation by and through language.
9. Philosophy Today: Volume > 60 > Issue: 4
Andrea Potestà, Donald Cross The Fragility of the Present and the Task of Thinking: Heidegger, Thinker of the Future
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
This article analyzes Heidegger’s Paris lecture, “The End of Philosophy and the Task of Thinking,” in an attempt to understand the historical “task” that Heidegger seeks to examine when confronted with the agony of philosophy today. I attempt to valorize the understanding of time and history that Heidegger stages in his reading by demonstrating its entrance to be radical and novel with respect to other moments in Heidegger’s production: history here is not of “destiny” (Schicksal), that is, it does not coincide with the appropriating orientation of man in time already presented in Heidegger’s other texts; rather, it is understood on the basis of the opening to the future that fragilizes and suspends all hope and all historical resolution. History is thought here as the desertification of present times, the completion of metaphysical nihilism, in which there opens at the same time a “perhaps” that, repeated many times throughout the lecture, takes up in all its complexity the problem of the future’s coming, of the extraordinary, of the opening, that is, of what, from the future, exceeds destiny.
10. Philosophy Today: Volume > 60 > Issue: 4
Rosaria Caldarone "Eternity, from Afar into Intimacy": Time and History in the Letters of Martin Heidegger to Hannah Arendt
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
According to Heidegger’s philosophy, the essence of time is not chronological; for this reason, history is not a linear succession of facts but is opened up by an event: that is what Heidegger’s philosophy reveals at first glance and it’s also what we can’t consider suspect today. But it is less obvious that the ‘base’ from which time and history will disclose themselves is the phenomenon of love: love stands out in the letters of Heidegger to Hannah Arendt as a most excellent way of temporalizing time, and it allows the philosophy of finitude to be reconciled with the eternity.