>> Go to Current Issue

Philosophia Christi

Volume 10
Responding to New Resurrection Challenges

Already a subscriber? - Login here
Not yet a subscriber? - Subscribe here

Displaying: 1-10 of 43 documents


1. Philosophia Christi: Volume > 10 > Issue: 2
Craig J. Hazen Editor’s Introduction
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
book symposium on resurrecting jesus
2. Philosophia Christi: Volume > 10 > Issue: 2
Stephen T. Davis Comments on Dale Allison’s Resurrecting Jesus
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
The present paper is a response to, and critique of, Dale Allison’s recent book, Resurrecting Jesus. While deeply appreciative of much of the book, I try to assuage Allison’s doubts and worries about the traditional claim that Jesus was bodily raised. Accordingly, in the present brief paper, I briefly explain and try to solve three difficulties that Allison raises in this area. The first concerns personal identity; the second concerns differences between Jesus’s resurrection and our resurrections; and the third concerns Allison’s doubts that our future existence will be embodied.
3. Philosophia Christi: Volume > 10 > Issue: 2
William Lane Craig Dale Allison on Jesus’s Empty Tomb, His Postmortem Appearances, and the Origin of the Disciples’ Belief in His Resurrection
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
I limit myself principally to a discussion of Dale Allison’s treatment of what I take to be the three central facts undergirding a historical inference to Jesus’s resurrection, namely, the discovery of his empty tomb, his postmortem appearances, and the origin of the disciples’ belief that God had raised Jesus from the dead. I am not here concerned with the question of which hypothesis best explains these three facts but rather with the historicity of the events themselves. I argue that Allison’s handling of the evidence, particularly for the empty tomb, is uneven and overly sceptical, while his case against the empty tomb is surprisingly weak. I close with some reflections on why worldview considerations need not lead to a suspension of judgment on the best explanation of these facts.
4. Philosophia Christi: Volume > 10 > Issue: 2
Gary R. Habermas Dale Allison’s Resurrection Skepticism: A Critique
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
The chief purpose of this essay is to address the alternative scenarios that Dale Allison suggests regarding the historicity of Jesus’s resurrection. Do other options explain viably the New Testament accounts? Special attention is paid to Allison’s treatment of apparitions of the dead, as well as listing several unique qualities of Jesus’s appearances. Throughout, attention is drawn to Allison’s own conclusions that support the disciples really having seen Jesus again after his death.
5. Philosophia Christi: Volume > 10 > Issue: 2
Dale C. Allison, Jr. The Resurrection of Jesus and Rational Apologetics
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
The apologetical case for the resurrection of Jesus faces at least three difficulties. The first is that the literal resurrection of Jesus from his tomb cannot be the prototype for the eschatological fate of those whose physical bodies no longer exist. The second is that the argument for the historicity of the empty tomb is less certain than often thought. The third is that the resurrection appearances of Jesus are, in several important respects, not so different from reports of apparitions of the dead in general.
book symposium on crossing the threshold of divine revelation
6. Philosophia Christi: Volume > 10 > Issue: 2
D. Stephen Long Abraham’s Threshold: Crossing with Caution
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
William Abraham seeks to free Western Christianity from its epistemological captivity, at least as that captivity takes the form of a “criterion” that seeks certainty. To do so, he has developed “canonical theism,” an intriguing argument that draws on diverse means of grace for knowledge of God as justified belief. In Crossing the Threshold he gives us the epistemology for that project. Yet questions remains as to why it still needs an epistemology, why knowledge remains justified belief, and why it cannot find more allies in other contemporary theological sensibilities.
7. Philosophia Christi: Volume > 10 > Issue: 2
James Beilby On Revelation and Divine Perception: A Response to William J. Abraham
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
While there is much to be valued in William Abraham’s book, Crossing the Threshold of Divine Revelation, in this article I develop a couple lines of critique using Alvin Plantinga’s religious epistemology as a point of comparison. While Abraham clearly wants to avoid what he sees as methodological and theological mistakes in Plantinga’s project, I suggest that he both misconstrues Plantinga’s project and, in fact, falls prey to some of the same problems that purportedly plague Plantinga’s approach.
8. Philosophia Christi: Volume > 10 > Issue: 2
James K. A. Smith Epistemology for the Rest of Us: Hints of a Paradigm Shift in Abraham’s Crossing the Threshold
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
William Abraham’s “canonical theism” calls into question standard strategies in philosophy of religion which (1) strain out the particularities of Christian faith, distilling a “mere theism” and (2) position Christian faith within a broader, “general” epistemology. I evaluate Abraham’s call for a philosophical approach that honors the thick particularity of Christian faith and makes room for the unique epistemological status of revelation. I conclude that Abraham’s promising project could be extended to more radically call into question the “intellectualism” that characterizes contemporary philosophy of religion.
9. Philosophia Christi: Volume > 10 > Issue: 2
William J. Abraham Response to Professors Long, Smith, and Beilby
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Canonical theists insist that the Church initially canonized a Trinitarian ontology, leaving epistemic convictions to speak for themselves. Pursuing epistemology is a vital exercise in its own right. Within this, particularism is compatible with metaknowledge, with a doctrine of analogy, and with the propositional content of Christian theism. We can also build on past insights and accommodate ordinary believers who have no idea what epistemology is. This program overlaps with the work of Plantinga but differs in its analysis of the Holy Spirit and argues that a diachronic account of warrant can better handle the problems to be faced.
articles
10. Philosophia Christi: Volume > 10 > Issue: 2
Arnold T. Guminski A Critical Examination of Mark R. Nowacki’s Novel Version of the Kalam Cosmological Argument
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
This article examines Nowacki’s novel version of the kalam cosmological argument (N-KCA), and finds it seriously flawed. The N-KCA purportedly shows the factual impossibility of a denumerably infinite set of coexisting concrete entities; and that there would be such a set were an infinite temporal series of events to obtain because each existing substance bears its own necessarily permanent temporal marks and those of its ancestors. Nowacki, professing the A-theory of time, nevertheless maintains that truth-makers of past-event propositions are not tensed facts, according to some correspondence theory of truth, but rather the temporal marks borne by existing substances.