Already a subscriber? Login here
Not yet a subscriber? - Subscribe here

Displaying: 1-10 of 11855 documents


1. The Journal of Philosophy: Volume > 114 > Issue: 11
Stephanie Collins, Filling Collective Duty Gaps
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
A collective duty gap arises when a group has caused harm that requires remedying but no (or not enough) member(s) did harm that can justify the imposition of individual remedial duties. Examples range from airplane crashes to climate change. How might collective duty gaps be filled? This paper starts by examining two promising proposals for filling them. Both proposals are found inadequate. Thus, while gap-filling duties can be defended against objections from unfairness and demandingness, we need a substantive justification for their existence. I argue that substantive justification can be found in the normative force of commitments individuals make to others with regard to ends. Along the way, I argue that gap-filling duties must be conceptualized differently in group agents, as compared to non-agent groups: in the former, gap-filling duties can be understood as duties to “take up the slack”; in the latter, this would be a category error.
2. The Journal of Philosophy: Volume > 114 > Issue: 11
H. K. Andersen, Pattens, Information, and Causation
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
This paper articulates an account of causation as a collection of information-theoretic relationships between patterns instantiated in the causal nexus. I draw on Dennett’s account of real patterns to characterize potential causal relata as patterns with specific identification criteria and noise tolerance levels, and actual causal relata as those patterns instantiated at some spatiotemporal location in the rich causal nexus as originally developed by Salmon. I develop a representation framework using phase space to precisely characterize causal relata, including their degree(s) of counterfactual robustness, causal profiles, causal connectivity, and privileged grain size. By doing so, I show how the philosophical notion of causation can be rendered in a format that is amenable for direct application of mathematical techniques from information theory such that the resulting informational measures are causal informational measures. This account provides a metaphysics of causation that supports interventionist semantics and causal modeling and discovery techniques.
book reviews
3. The Journal of Philosophy: Volume > 114 > Issue: 11
David Mark Kovacs, Thomas Hofweber: Ontology and the Ambitions of Metaphysics
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
4. The Journal of Philosophy: Volume > 114 > Issue: 10
Kit Fine, Form
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
We pose a puzzle for forms and show how it might be solved by appeal to the theory of arbitrary objects. We also discuss how the resulting account of forms relates to issues concerning structural universals and the nature of abstraction.
5. The Journal of Philosophy: Volume > 114 > Issue: 10
Rachael Wiseman, What Am I and What Am I Doing?
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
There is a deep connection between Anscombe’s argument that ‘I’ is not a referring expression and Intention’s account of practical knowledge and knowledge without observation. The assumption that the so-called “no-reference thesis” can be resisted while the account of action set out in her book INTENTION is embraced is based on a misunderstanding of the argument of “The First Person” and the status of its conclusion; removing that misunderstanding helps to illuminate the concept of practical knowledge and brings into view a novel account of the relation between self-consciousness, agency, and first-person thought.
6. The Journal of Philosophy: Volume > 114 > Issue: 10
Stephen Maitzen, Substantial Change: Continuous, Consistent, Objective
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Since antiquity, philosophers have struggled to describe the instant of change in continuous time in a way that is both consistent with classical logic and also objective rather than arbitrary. A particularly important version of this problem arises, I argue, for substantial change, that is, any case in which a metaphysical substance comes into or goes out of existence. I then offer and defend an analysis of the instant of substantial change in continuous time that is consistent with classical logic and objective rather than arbitrary. My key assumption is that, necessarily, every substance ages at every instant at which it exists, from which I conclude that no substance has a first or a last instant of its existence if time is continuous. I also suggest that my solution offers some support for endurantism about substances.
book reviews
7. The Journal of Philosophy: Volume > 114 > Issue: 10
Ernest Sosa, Duncan Pritchard: Epistemic Angst: Radical Skepticism and the Groundlessness of Our Believing
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
8. The Journal of Philosophy: Volume > 114 > Issue: 10
New Books
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
9. The Journal of Philosophy: Volume > 114 > Issue: 9
Jeffrey Sanford Russell, Composition as Abstraction
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
The existence of mereological sums can be derived from an abstraction principle in a way analogous to numbers. I draw lessons for the thesis that “composition is innocent” from neo-Fregeanism in the philosophy of mathematics.
10. The Journal of Philosophy: Volume > 114 > Issue: 9
Yannig Luthra, Self-Trust and Knowledge of Action
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
This paper argues that you have non-observational warrant for beliefs about the body in action. For example, if you mean to be drinking a cup of water, you can know independently of observation that you are moving your body in a way that is effective in enabling you to drink. The case I make centers on the claim that you have default warrant to trust your agency. You do well to trust your agency just in virtue of your status as an agent, and are not required to earn permission to trust your agency through making use of evidence about how well your agency works. You have non-observational warrant for beliefs about the functioning of your agency, including beliefs about your body in action, inasmuch as those beliefs reflect trust in your agency.