Already a subscriber? - Login here
Not yet a subscriber? - Subscribe here

Browse by:


  • Issue: 1

Displaying: 1-6 of 6 documents


1. Idealistic Studies: Volume > 48 > Issue: 1
Jennifer A. Bates From the Editor
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
articles
2. Idealistic Studies: Volume > 48 > Issue: 1
Farshid Baghai Systematic Needs of the Doctrine of Elements in Critique of Pure Reason
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Most interpretations of Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason focus on its Doctrine of Elements, and ignore that the Doctrine of Elements needs to be grounded systematically in the Doctrine of Method. As a step toward remedying such neglect, this paper outlines the relation between the Doctrine of Elements and the Doctrine of Method within the Critique. It lays out the three systematic needs implied in the Doctrine of Elements, and shows that, in Kant’s account, these needs can be satisfied only in the Doctrine of Method. In doing so, the paper reveals the systematic dependence of the elements of cognitions on the method of cognition from pure reason.
3. Idealistic Studies: Volume > 48 > Issue: 1
Andrew Cooper Systematicity in Kant’s Third Critique
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Kant’s Critique of the Power of Judgment is often interpreted in light of its initial reception. Conventionally, this reception is examined in the work of Fichte, Schelling and Hegel, who found in Kant’s third Critique a new task for philosophy: the construction of an absolute, self-grounding system. This paper identifies an alternative line of reception in the work of physiologists and medical practitioners during the 1790s and early 1800s, including Kielmeyer, Reil, Girtanner and Oken. It argues that these naturalists called on Kant’s third Critique to solidify an experimental natural history that classifies organic form within a system of laws. Kant held both kinds of system in tension, which is why the third Critique remains a singular and provocative text.
4. Idealistic Studies: Volume > 48 > Issue: 1
J. Colin McQuillan Kant on Scholarship and the Public Use of Reason
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
In “An Answer to the Question: What is Enlightenment?,” Kant defines the public use of reason as “that use which someone makes of it as a scholar before the entire public of the world of readers.” Commentators rarely note Kant’s reference to “scholarship” in this passage and, when they do, they often disagree about its meaning and significance. This paper addresses those disagreements by exploring discussions of scholarship in Kant’s logic lectures as well as in later works like The Conflict of the Faculties. These sources suggest that Kant defends a rigorous conception of scholarship, which may not be consistent with liberal and egalitarian interpretations of the public use of reason. The paper concludes that Kant’s account of the public use of reason provides only a limited defense of freedoms of speech and of the press, which is neither as liberal nor as egalitarian as other commentators have suggested.
5. Idealistic Studies: Volume > 48 > Issue: 1
Dennis Vanden Auweele The Later Schelling on Philosophical Religion and Christianity
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Schelling’s later philosophy (1820 onwards) was historically received as a disappointment: the once brazen Romantic and pantheist becomes a pious Christian in his old age. Indeed, Schelling’s Berlin lectures on revelation and mythology culminate in a suspicious level of Christian orthodoxy. In the last few years, a number of scholars have offered a different reading of Schelling’s Spätphilosophie, particularly by pointing out his rethinking of nature, revelation, and Christianity. In this paper, I offer a systematic reading of Schelling’s later philosophy so as to show that his views of a philosophical religion fit within the trajectory of his thought. Nevertheless, Schelling does recourse overtly hasty in (Christian) religion.
book review
6. Idealistic Studies: Volume > 48 > Issue: 1
Martin Donougho Angelica Nuzzo, Approaching Hegel’s Logic, Obliquely: Melville, Molière, Beckett
view |  rights & permissions | cited by