Already a subscriber? - Login here
Not yet a subscriber? - Subscribe here

Displaying: 1-1 of 1 documents


1. Business Ethics Journal Review: Volume > 3 > Issue: 4
Matthias Hühn Adam Smith: 18th Century Sentimentalist or 20th Century Rationalist?
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
David Bevan and Patricia Werhane try to enlist Adam Smith’s support in countering the neoclassical narrative in business ethics and CSR. While I applaud their goal and also completely agree with their argument that Smith has been radically misinterpreted by the economics mainstream, I am not completely in agreement with how they argue. In short, I believe they also have uprooted Adam Smith and transformed him in parts into a 20th century philosopher. The 18th century Adam Smith would be a much more powerful advocate for ethics in business if he were accepted as the very eclectic 18th century philosopher that he was.