|
1.
|
Teaching Philosophy:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 3/4
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
2.
|
Teaching Philosophy:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 3/4
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
3.
|
Teaching Philosophy:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 3/4
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
4.
|
Teaching Philosophy:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 3/4
Robert C. Solomon
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
Despite the upsurge of popularity, Hegel still suffers from strangulation in the current philosophical climate. This is all the more surprising as so many American philosophers of importance (and not just Royce and Dewey, but Quine and Goodman and Davidson, as well) display clearly compatible themes in their work. The problem is that most Hegel scholars, and consequently most professional readers of Hegel, and again their students, continue to insist on approaching the great philosopher with awe instead of confidence. Although respect is necessary for a fair reading, a good deal of personal chutzbah (not Hegel's word) is necessary to appropriate Hegel. I find teaching Hegel one of my most rewarding courses just because, of all the philosophers of the modern period, he most inspires his students to stretch their imaginations and rethink virtually everything. How ironie, therefore, that his effect has so often rather been to stultify imagination in deference to textual exegesis. Hegel has not yet been wholly rediscovered.
|
|
|
5.
|
Teaching Philosophy:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 3/4
Gary Bedell
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
6.
|
Teaching Philosophy:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 3/4
David T. Ozar
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
7.
|
Teaching Philosophy:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 3/4
Alison M. Jaggar
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
8.
|
Teaching Philosophy:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 3/4
Gerhard Schmitt
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
9.
|
Teaching Philosophy:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 3/4
Alan Montefiore
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
10.
|
Teaching Philosophy:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 3/4
Frans Van Der Bogert
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
11.
|
Teaching Philosophy:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 3/4
Jack Friedlander, Katherine Shamey
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
12.
|
Teaching Philosophy:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 3/4
Stephen T. Franklin
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
13.
|
Teaching Philosophy:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 3/4
Natalie Abrams
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
How one goes about teaching medical ethics greatly depends upon one's interpretation of the discipline itself. Before discussing pedagogical isslIes, the primary focus ofthe paper, I will address the question of what "philosophical" medical ethics is and is not. I will then suggest some alternative approac:hes forincluding such material in a variety of different contexts, including courses geared toward philosophy students, those focusing on undergraduate students preparing for careers in one of the health care professions, and those actually within professional schools, primarily medical schools, with which I am mostfamiliar. I will end with remarks on the implications of medical etllics for medicine and for philosophy.
|
|
|
14.
|
Teaching Philosophy:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 3/4
J. Howard Sobel
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
15.
|
Teaching Philosophy:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 3/4
S. K. Lindemann
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
16.
|
Teaching Philosophy:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 3/4
Laurence BonJour
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
17.
|
Teaching Philosophy:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 3/4
Alan Hausman
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
18.
|
Teaching Philosophy:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 3/4
Jack Nelson
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
19.
|
Teaching Philosophy:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 3/4
Nancy Cummings
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
20.
|
Teaching Philosophy:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 3/4
Gary Bedell
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|