LOGIN
PRODUCTS
All Products
Online Resources
Journals & Series
Digital Media
Books & Reference Works
E-Collection
About
Alphabetically
By Category
Price Lists
Terms and Conditions
MEMBERSHIPS
Societies & Associations
Conference Registrations
SERVICES
Conference Exhibits
Conference Registrations
Electronic Publishing
Journal Advertising
Mailing Lists
Marketing Services
Membership Services
Production Typesetting
Subscription Fulfillment
ABOUT
About us
Contact
FAQs
Order Info
Privacy
Support
This Title
All Titles
Browse
>
Volume
>
34
>> Go to Current Issue
Southwest Philosophy Review
Volume 34
Already a subscriber? -
Login here
Not yet a subscriber? -
Subscribe here
Browse by:
Volume
Year
--- Volume ---
40
39
38
37
36
35
34
33
32
31
30
29
28
27
26
25
24
23
22
21
20
19
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
11 Supplement
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
--- Year ---
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1995 Supplement
1994
1993
1992
1991
1990
1989
1988
1986
1985
1984
Issue: 2
Issue: 1
Overview
Free Content
Editorial Team
RSS Feeds
E-mail Updates
Special Issues
About the Society
Indexing / Abstracting
Submission Guidelines
Rights & Permissions
Results per page:
20
50
100
Sort by:
Page Number - ascending
Page Number - descending
Date - recent first
Date - oldest first
Title
Author
<< additional functions
Displaying: 1-20 of 45 documents
1
2
3
>
commentaries
1.
Southwest Philosophy Review:
Volume
>
34
>
Issue: 2
Allysson Vasconcelos Lima Rocha
Limits for Genuinely Understanding:
Comments on Heikes’ Paper “Don’t be Ignorant”
view
|
rights & permissions
|
cited by
SHARE
2.
Southwest Philosophy Review:
Volume
>
34
>
Issue: 2
Landon W. Schurtz
Comments on Dadlez’s “Kitsch and Bullshit as Aesthetic and Epistemic Transgressions”
view
|
rights & permissions
|
cited by
SHARE
3.
Southwest Philosophy Review:
Volume
>
34
>
Issue: 2
Nathan L. Cartagena
A Commentary on “Human Plurality as Object: An Arendtian Framework for Making Sense of Trump”
view
|
rights & permissions
|
cited by
SHARE
4.
Southwest Philosophy Review:
Volume
>
34
>
Issue: 2
Jerry Green
Maybe We Should Take Human Rights Seriously:
A Reply to Nelson
view
|
rights & permissions
|
cited by
SHARE
5.
Southwest Philosophy Review:
Volume
>
34
>
Issue: 2
Matthew Z. Donnelly
Commentary on Fischer’s and Wiegman’s “The Disassociation Intuition”
view
|
rights & permissions
|
cited by
SHARE
6.
Southwest Philosophy Review:
Volume
>
34
>
Issue: 2
Karl Aho
Sharpening our Tools for Moral Inquiry:
Comments on Justin Bell’s “Depression Applied to Moral Imagination”
view
|
rights & permissions
|
cited by
SHARE
7.
Southwest Philosophy Review:
Volume
>
34
>
Issue: 2
Chelsea Bowden
Moral Motivation and Epistemic Virtue:
Comments on Thomas Metcalf’s “An Epistemic-Virtue Solution to Some Peer-Disagreements in Philosophy”
view
|
rights & permissions
|
cited by
SHARE
8.
Southwest Philosophy Review:
Volume
>
34
>
Issue: 2
Jonathan McKinney
Comments on Bromhall:
Calkins and Nishida
view
|
rights & permissions
|
cited by
SHARE
9.
Southwest Philosophy Review:
Volume
>
34
>
Issue: 2
Noell Birondo
Whose Metaethical Minimalism?
view
|
rights & permissions
|
cited by
SHARE
10.
Southwest Philosophy Review:
Volume
>
34
>
Issue: 2
Todd M. Stewart
Comments on Morton’s “A Dilemma for Streetian Constructivism”
view
|
rights & permissions
|
cited by
SHARE
11.
Southwest Philosophy Review:
Volume
>
34
>
Issue: 2
Susan V. H. Castro
Why Ever Doubt First-Person Testimony about Disability?
view
|
rights & permissions
|
cited by
SHARE
12.
Southwest Philosophy Review:
Volume
>
34
>
Issue: 2
Mary Gwin
Commentary on Peter Westmoreland’s “Act Like a Right-Hander: Right Hand Bias in Norms of Proximate Space Inhabitation”
view
|
rights & permissions
|
cited by
SHARE
13.
Southwest Philosophy Review:
Volume
>
34
>
Issue: 2
Fiacha Heneghan
Reply to Justin Remhof
view
|
rights & permissions
|
cited by
SHARE
14.
Southwest Philosophy Review:
Volume
>
34
>
Issue: 2
Julie Kuhlken
Hegel and the Habit of Language: Theme and Variation
view
|
rights & permissions
|
cited by
SHARE
15.
Southwest Philosophy Review:
Volume
>
34
>
Issue: 2
Dave Beisecker
Finding a Right Price:
Comments for Thomas Dabay’s “On the Inconsistency of Naturalism and Global Expressivism”
view
|
rights & permissions
|
cited by
SHARE
16.
Southwest Philosophy Review:
Volume
>
34
>
Issue: 2
Mark Silcox
Comments on “Nonfunctional Semantics in Plant Signaling” by Mark Bauer
view
|
rights & permissions
|
cited by
SHARE
17.
Southwest Philosophy Review:
Volume
>
34
>
Issue: 2
James Mock
On Kenneth L. Brewer’s “There Will be Monsters: A Defense of Noël Carroll’s Definition of the Horror Genre”
view
|
rights & permissions
|
cited by
SHARE
18.
Southwest Philosophy Review:
Volume
>
34
>
Issue: 2
Paul Martens
Reexamining Kierkegaard, Hegel, and Taylor:
A Response to Andrew Rose
view
|
rights & permissions
|
cited by
SHARE
open submission articles
19.
Southwest Philosophy Review:
Volume
>
34
>
Issue: 2
Daniel Coren
Always Choose to Live or Choose to Always Live?
abstract
|
view
|
rights & permissions
|
cited by
Bernard Williams (1973) famously argued that if given the choice to relinquish our mortality we should refuse. We should not choose to always live. His piece provoked an entire literature on the desirability of immortality. Intending to contradict Williams, Thomas Nagel claimed that if given the choice between living for a week and dying in five minutes he would always choose to live. I argue that (1) Nagel’s iterating scenario is closer to the original Makropulos case (Čapek’s) that inspired Williams’s piece; (2) iterating versions of the choice given in the Makropulos case might well be less desirable than a one-time choice; and (3) Nagel’s mathematical induction premise is implausible. I discuss some useful implications of (1)-(3) for the broader discussion of Williams’s arguments and, more generally, for our understanding of the value of mortality and the possibility of mutually consistent but necessarily incompatible wants in ordinary human psychology.
SHARE
20.
Southwest Philosophy Review:
Volume
>
34
>
Issue: 2
Eugene Marshall
What are Spinoza’s Inadequate Ideas of?
view
|
rights & permissions
|
cited by
SHARE
1
2
3
>