Already a subscriber? - Login here
Not yet a subscriber? - Subscribe here

Browse by:



Displaying: 1-20 of 26 documents


1. Philotheos: Volume > 9
Jörg Splett

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

2. Philotheos: Volume > 9
Wolfgang Speyer

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

3. Philotheos: Volume > 9
Татьяна Григорьевна Человенко

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

4. Philotheos: Volume > 9
Christos Terezis, Kalomoira Polychronopoulou

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

5. Philotheos: Volume > 9
Mostafa Younesie

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

6. Philotheos: Volume > 9
Jean-Michel Charrue

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

7. Philotheos: Volume > 9
Vladan Perišić

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

8. Philotheos: Volume > 9
Milosav Vešović, Noel Putnik

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

9. Philotheos: Volume > 9
Zoran Djurović

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

10. Philotheos: Volume > 9
Jovan Milanović

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

11. Philotheos: Volume > 9
Anita Strezova

abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
This article explores the fundamental Christological principles discussed by Byzantine iconophile writers of the eight and ninth centuries, John of Damascus (675-749), Theodore the Studite (759-826) and Patriarch Nikephoros I of Constantinople (758-828). Within the larger context of theological concerns, the iconophile focus their attention on two key points: (a) the notion of the hypostatic union of human and divine natures in Christ; and (b) the properties of circumscription and uncircumscribability. These Christological aspects play critical part in supporting the main objective of iconophiles, the defense of Chalcedonian formulation, of which the theoretical justification of Christ’s pictorial representation is simply one part, albeit a central one. In support to their theological cause, the iconophiles also make recourse to the distinction between nature and hypostasis and devote an important part of their exposition for the holy images on the dogmatic significance of the Incarnation.

12. Philotheos: Volume > 9
Stamatios D. Gerogiorgakis

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

13. Philotheos: Volume > 9
Katelis Viglas

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

14. Philotheos: Volume > 9
Branko Gorgiev

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

15. Philotheos: Volume > 9
Monk Romilo of Hilandar

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

16. Philotheos: Volume > 9
Alois M. Haas

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

17. Philotheos: Volume > 9
Ben Lazare Mijušković

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

18. Philotheos: Volume > 9
Richard Wisser

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

19. Philotheos: Volume > 9
Сергей С. Хоружий

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

20. Philotheos: Volume > 9
М. А. Маслин

view |  rights & permissions | cited by