Already a subscriber? - Login here
Not yet a subscriber? - Subscribe here

Browse by:



Displaying: 1-20 of 28 documents


1. Philotheos: Volume > 15
Wolfgang Speyer

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

2. Philotheos: Volume > 15
Heinrich Beck

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

3. Philotheos: Volume > 15
Andre M. Archie

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

4. Philotheos: Volume > 15
Jelena Femić Kasapis

abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Εἰς τὴν παρούσαν ἐργασίαν ἐκτίθενται ἐνδεικτικὰ χωρία τοῦ ὅρου μύστης, ἔτσι ὅπως εἶχε διαμορφωθεῖ ἡ χρήση του καὶ oἱ σημασιολογικὲς ἀποχρώσεις ποὺ λαμβάνει σὲ χωρία ἀρχαίων συγγραφέων. Παρουσιάζονται ἕξι χωρία, τὰ ὁποῖα ἀποδεικνύουν ὅτι ὁ μύστης ἦταν μέτοχος καὶ πλῆρες μέλος τῶν μυστηριακῶν λατρειῶν, ὄχι μόνο τῶν Μυστηρίων, ἀλλὰ καὶ τῶν ὀργίων. Κάθε χωρίο ἀκολουθείται ἀπὸ μετάφραση σὲ μία ἀπὸ τὶς σύγχρονες γλῶσσες. Ἀπὸ τὸ χωρίο τοῦ Ἀριστοφάνη προκύπτει ὅτι ὁ ὅρος ἀρχικὰ εἶχε διατυπωθεῖ ὡς ἐπίθετο καὶ ὄχι ὡς οὐσιαστικό. Ὡς τέτοιο μέρος τοῦ λόγου, λειτουργεῖ καὶ ὡς προσωνυμία (ἐπωνυμία) τῶν ἀρχαίων θεοτήτων. Παρ΄ὅλο ποὺ ἡ σημασιολογία του δείχνει νοηματικὴ διαφάνεια, ἡ ἐτυμολογία τοῦ ὅρου παραμένει ἀνεπαρκῶς προσδιορισμένη. Στὰ ἐτυμολογικὰ λεξικὰ δὲν ἀποτελεῖ ξεχωριστὸ λῆμμα, ἀλλὰ συγκαταλέγεται στὰ ὀνοματικὰ παράγωγα τοῦ ῥήματος μύω.This paper presents indicative quotations of the term mystes. They are taken from the texts of ancient writers, focusing on the way its use and its semasiological aspects were formed. Six excerpts are selected to assess the fact that mystes was an active participant and a full member of the ancient Mystery cults, not only of the Mysteries, but of the Orgies, too. Most quotations are followed by their interpretation in English or French. Aristophanes’ fragment leads to conclusion that initially the term was introduced and formulated rather as an adjective, than as a noun. As such, it serves as a name, title, or cognomen, referring to ancient deities. Although its semasiology indicates rather intelligible transparency, its etymology remains insufficiently determined. In etymological dictionaries it is not presented as a separate lemma, but is assumed to be a noun derivative of a verb, thus presented s.v. μύω [mýō].

5. Philotheos: Volume > 15
Adriana Neacșu

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

6. Philotheos: Volume > 15
Katharina Comoth

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

7. Philotheos: Volume > 15
Christos Térézis, Lydia Kassi

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

8. Philotheos: Volume > 15
Rodoljub Kubat

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

9. Philotheos: Volume > 15
Marina Stojanović

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

10. Philotheos: Volume > 15
Vladan Tatalović

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

11. Philotheos: Volume > 15
Mikonja Knežević

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

12. Philotheos: Volume > 15
Dragan Radić

abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
The aim of this paper is to demonstrate the hermeneutical method of Theodoret of Cyrus, who was one of the most important Biblical commentators and an influential theologian of the School of Antioch. This paper attempts to point out the fact that in the person of the Blessed Theodoret we find the first attempt of synthesis between the Antioch and Alexandria hermeneutical schools. In his hermeneutical work Theodoret attempted to overcome the contradictions existing up to that point and to follow a middle way, without discarding neither the literal nor the spiritual-allegorical interpretation. It could be argued that Theodoret rejected the extreme hermeneutical trends of both the Alexandrian and Antioch inspirations; he developed his unique methods and tactics, which were rooted in the previous patristic tradition of the Church Fathers.

13. Philotheos: Volume > 15
Aleksandar Stojanović

abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
This article deals with the relationship of the Sinaitic Fathers and Evagrius of Pont. On the one hand, their main representative St. John Climacus strongly criticized some Evagrius’ fallacies, while on the other hand used thе good side of his ascetic teachings. Furthermore, the specificity of location of the Sinai Monastery resulted that God seeing, contemplation and theology exercised through the Sinaitic Fathers became ideals of the ascetical spirituality. All these ideals originate in ascetical teaching of Evagrius whose correct teachings and soul-benefit readings, at first, were acknowledged by the Fathers of Gaza. Later it was passed onto the Fathers from Sinai and ultimately unto the all ascetical tradition primarily unto the Neptic tradition.

14. Philotheos: Volume > 15
Nichifor Tănase

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

15. Philotheos: Volume > 15
Jovan Ćulibrk

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

16. Philotheos: Volume > 15
Predrag Čičovački

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

17. Philotheos: Volume > 15
Marko Vilotić

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

18. Philotheos: Volume > 15
Jörg Splett

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

19. Philotheos: Volume > 15
Andrej Jeftić

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

20. Philotheos: Volume > 15
Blagoje Pantelić

view |  rights & permissions | cited by