|
1.
|
The Acorn:
Volume >
17 >
Issue: 2
Greg Moses
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
2.
|
The Acorn:
Volume >
17 >
Issue: 2
Barry Gan
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
3.
|
The Acorn:
Volume >
17 >
Issue: 2
Jack DuVall
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
4.
|
The Acorn:
Volume >
17 >
Issue: 2
Charles K. Fink
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
Pacifists are often put on the defensive with cases—real or imagined—in which innocent people are threatened by violent criminals. Is it always wrong to respond to violence with violence, even in defense of the innocent? This is the “hard” question addressed in this article. I argue that it is at least permissible to maintain one’s commitment to nonviolence in such cases. This may not seem like a bold conclusion, yet pacifists are often ridiculed—sometimes as cowards, sometimes as selfish moral purists—for their refusal to use violence in defense of others. In this article, I try to show that such scorn is unjustified.
|
|
|
5.
|
The Acorn:
Volume >
17 >
Issue: 2
Matthew Rukgaber
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
Using Kant’s argument that lies are evil and reprehensible in themselves regardless of the benefits that may result, I show that guns can be understood in similar terms. In a unique reading of Kant’s radical and often ridiculed ideas, I maintain that lies have this status because of the way they pervert our relationship to the truth and thus to morality and reason. Lies turn truth and reason into mere means to be used rather than to be obeyed. Kant believes that the result is arrogance, insincerity, and self-deception in the form of moral impurity and depravity. This gives way to the morally bankrupt logics of the passions for honor, dominance, and possession. I argue that this destruction of virtue and of our relation to the moral law can be found in our relation to guns. Guns are not just killing machines; they are deception machines. It is for that reason, regardless of the costs and benefits, that the Kantian should deny that we have any right to them.
|
|
|
|
6.
|
The Acorn:
Volume >
17 >
Issue: 2
Court Lewis
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
7.
|
The Acorn:
Volume >
17 >
Issue: 2
William Gay
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
8.
|
The Acorn:
Volume >
17 >
Issue: 2
Sanjay Lal
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
9.
|
The Acorn:
Volume >
17 >
Issue: 2
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|