|
1.
|
Philotheos:
Volume >
6
Федор Иванович Гиренок
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
2.
|
Philotheos:
Volume >
6
Georg Scherer
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
3.
|
Philotheos:
Volume >
6
Jörg Splett
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
4.
|
Philotheos:
Volume >
6
Werner Theobald
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
5.
|
Philotheos:
Volume >
6
Spyridoula Athanasopoulou-Kypriou
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
The aims of this paper are to qualify theologically Paul Fiddes’ claim that creative writing can be understood as a response to divine revelation and to construct a preliminary sketch of a theological framework in order to appreciate textuality and move from reading literary texts in the light of theology to considering them as theology, that is, as sacraments of communion with God. What follows is, thus, an inquiry into some of the theological presuppositions and criteria, which would enable a reader with a Christian perspective to consider any literary text theologically and read it as a kind of doxology.
|
|
|
|
6.
|
Philotheos:
Volume >
6
Валерий Дмитриевич Губин
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
7.
|
Philotheos:
Volume >
6
Markus Enders
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
8.
|
Philotheos:
Volume >
6
Franz Weber, Tanja Pihlar
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
9.
|
Philotheos:
Volume >
6
Душан Крцуновић
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
This paper deals with the reasons for literal interpretation of Plato’s Timaeus (Aristoteles) against non-literal (Speusippus and Xenocrates). Its starting point is “dichotomy” between poetry (mythos) and philosophy that we can find, as well, in some commentary on the Genesis of Moses. But, instead dichotomy here is suggested some kind of iterative reading: the Timaeus of Plato is the poetry because God’s act of creation is the poetry, too. Artistic elements in this dialogue of Plato are in the function of his cosmogonical realism. It is supported with the thesis that the purpose of Plato’s Timaeus is not pedagogical or didactical, but soteriological; its aim is salvation of man.
|
|
|
|
10.
|
Philotheos:
Volume >
6
Christos Terezis, Zoé Antonopoulou-Trechli
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
11.
|
Philotheos:
Volume >
6
Katelis Viglas
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
12.
|
Philotheos:
Volume >
6
Валерий Яковлевич Саврей
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
13.
|
Philotheos:
Volume >
6
Torstein Theodor Tollefsen
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
14.
|
Philotheos:
Volume >
6
Jean-Claude Larchet
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
15.
|
Philotheos:
Volume >
6
Boris B. Brajović
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
In the virtue ethics of Diadochus Photice, the notion of self-rule (αὐτεξούσιον) is of paramount importance for the creative progress in one’s moral perfection. With the proper use of self-rule man can escape sin and turn himself to love. In addition, Diadochus also uses the notion of apatheia (ἀπάθεια) to indicate the way for a successful cleansing (κάθαρσις) of the soul, so that with this cleansing man can grasp the logoi (λόγοι) of beings. According to Diadochus Photice, virtue ethics must not be conceived in an anthropocentric way, but in a theocentric one, and so virtue does not depend only on the ethical achievements of man, but on divine grace and on the personal relation of man to God.
|
|
|
|
16.
|
Philotheos:
Volume >
6
Georgi Kapriev
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
17.
|
Philotheos:
Volume >
6
Stavros Yangazoglou
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
18.
|
Philotheos:
Volume >
6
Werner Beierwaltes
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
19.
|
Philotheos:
Volume >
6
Olga Timofeevna Loyko
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
20.
|
Philotheos:
Volume >
6
Виктор Троицкий
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|