Already a subscriber? - Login here
Not yet a subscriber? - Subscribe here

Browse by:



Displaying: 1-20 of 25 documents


1. Philotheos: Volume > 8
Richard Schaeffler

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

2. Philotheos: Volume > 8
Wolfgang Speyer

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

3. Philotheos: Volume > 8
Hermann Schmitz

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

4. Philotheos: Volume > 8
Richard Wisser

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

5. Philotheos: Volume > 8
Kofi Ackah

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

6. Philotheos: Volume > 8
John Mouracade

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

7. Philotheos: Volume > 8
Tschasslaw D. Kopriwitza

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

8. Philotheos: Volume > 8
Matthieu Guyot

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

9. Philotheos: Volume > 8
Юрий Анатольевич Шичалин

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

10. Philotheos: Volume > 8
Dionysis Skliris

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

11. Philotheos: Volume > 8
Mary C. Sheridan

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

12. Philotheos: Volume > 8
Edward Moore

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

13. Philotheos: Volume > 8
Vasilije Vranić

abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
The mid fifth century was largely marked by a Christological controversy that began with private teachings of the ambassador of the Alexandrian see to Constantinople, the prominent Archimandrite Eutyches. The precise teaching of Eutyches remains somewhat obscure, since no written work by him is extant. Thus, everything that the modern historical scholarship knows about Eutyches’ theology comes from secondary sources, such as the writings of his opponents or scontemporary Synodal Acts. Consequently, the fine points of Eutyches’ Christological position are subject of scholarly debate. However, on the basis of the unchallenged contemporary historical evidence, as it is found in the original trial of Eutyches for heresy at the Synod of Constantinople in 448 AD, a critical evaluation of Eutyches’ Christological position seems possible. In this article it was argued that the Christological teaching of Eutyches was inadequate in terms of the later Christological standard set at Chalcedon (451 AD).

14. Philotheos: Volume > 8
Heidi Marx-Wolf

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

15. Philotheos: Volume > 8
Markus Enders

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

16. Philotheos: Volume > 8
Βασίλειος Ἀθ. Τσίγκος

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

17. Philotheos: Volume > 8
Predrag Čičovački

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

18. Philotheos: Volume > 8
Evgenia V. Cherkasova

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

19. Philotheos: Volume > 8
Thomas Sören Hoffmann

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

20. Philotheos: Volume > 8
Josef Seifert

view |  rights & permissions | cited by