Already a subscriber? - Login here
Not yet a subscriber? - Subscribe here

Browse by:



Displaying: 1-2 of 2 documents


1. The Journal of Philosophy, Science & Law: Volume > 6 > Issue: 1
William O. Stephens

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

2. The Journal of Philosophy, Science & Law: Volume > 6 > Issue: 1
William O. Stephens

abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
The advances that have been made in the area of genetic technology over the past several years have caused a reflection into the grounds for emerging policy decisions that have emerged as a result of these stunning scientific breakthroughs. Inevitably, controversies have emerged as a result of these rapidly developing genetic discoveries. Recent British judicial decisions in this area have appeared to avoid directly dealing with the accompanying ethical issues. Instead they have appeared to take an ad hoc approach, by looking to statutory authority in aid of the outcome perceived as being the most favorable. This paper tries to outline the problems associated with this and argues instead, on behalf of what has been termed as Dworkinian principalism.