|
1.
|
The Lonergan Review:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 1
Richard M. Liddy
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
2.
|
The Lonergan Review:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 1
Patrick H. Byrne
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
3.
|
The Lonergan Review:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 1
Eileen De Neeve
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
4.
|
The Lonergan Review:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 1
Paul St. Amour
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
5.
|
The Lonergan Review:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 1
Paul Hoyt-O’Connor
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
6.
|
The Lonergan Review:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 1
Kenneth R. Melchin
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
7.
|
The Lonergan Review:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 1
Daniel Finn
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
8.
|
The Lonergan Review:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 1
Michael Shute
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
We shall have to do a lot of thinking and a lot of educating before we can hope that our exchange processes will swing easily and gracefully from an expansion into a static phase instead of falling clumsily and painfully into a slump.
|
|
|
9.
|
The Lonergan Review:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 1
Sean McNelis
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
10.
|
The Lonergan Review:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 1
William J. Zanardi
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
11.
|
The Lonergan Review:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 1
Patrick D. Brown
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
12.
|
The Lonergan Review:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 1
William Mathews
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
13.
|
The Lonergan Review:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 1
Fred Lawrence
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
Each human being is the best judge of what is most conducive to his or her own self-preservation, whether this be considered strictly as security of mere life, or as comfortable self-preservation, or as the pursuit of happiness. Liberty is just a means to this end, but a means so necessary, so pervasive, so paramount, that it most resembles an end in itself. The ambiguity of modern liberty—this oscillation between end and means—may be a theoretical liability or weakness, but it largelyaccounts for its prodigious dynamism.
|
|
|
14.
|
The Lonergan Review:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 1
Peter Corbishley
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
15.
|
The Lonergan Review:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 1
Philip McShane
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
16.
|
The Lonergan Review:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 1
Derek Bianchi Melchin
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
Need the moral be repeated? There exist two distinct circuits, each with its own final market. The equilibrium of the economic process is conditioned by the balance of the two circuits: each must be allowed the possibility of continuity, of basic outlay yielding an equal basic income and surplus outlay yieldingan equal surplus income, of basic and surplus income yielding equal basic and surplus expenditure, and of these grounding equivalent basic and surplus outlay. But what cannot be tolerated, much less sustained, is for one circuit to be drained by the other. That is the essence of dynamic disequilibrium.
|
|
|
17.
|
The Lonergan Review:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 1
Eileen de Neeve
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
18.
|
The Lonergan Review:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 1
Jim Morin, Howard Richards
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
19.
|
The Lonergan Review:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 1
Peter DeMarsh, Hugh Williams
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
20.
|
The Lonergan Review:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 1
Edward Gaffney, Emile Piscitelli
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|