Already a subscriber? - Login here
Not yet a subscriber? - Subscribe here

Browse by:



Displaying: 1-20 of 34 documents

Show/Hide alternate language

artykuły artykuły

1. Roczniki Filozoficzne: Volume > 61 > Issue: 4
Piotr Pasterczyk
Piotr Pasterczyk
Concept of Person in the Hans Eduard Hengstenberg’s Anthropology
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
2. Roczniki Filozoficzne: Volume > 61 > Issue: 4
Deborah Savage
Deborah Savage
Fundamentalne znaczenie przeżycia w Karola Wojtyły ujęciu osoby
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
The aim of this paper is to illuminate the centrality of lived experience in Karol Wojytla’s account of the person and identify its significance for philosophy and praxis in the contemporary period. Specifically the author intends to pursue the meaning of Wojtyla’s claim that “the category of lived experience must have a place in anthropology and ethics—and somehow be at the center of their respective interpretations.” The paper seeks to recover an important insight into the task of philosophy: according to Karol Wojtyla, if philosophy is to perform its essential function in the recovery of our culture, we have no choice but to turn our attention to the subjectivity of human persons—and this can only be done by taking up the somewhat risky challenge of studying the reality of lived human experience. The paper will analyze Wojtyla’s argument that the problem of human subjectivity is at the epicenter of debates about the human person and will argue that his solution reconciles the dilemma posed by the historical antinomies that have characterized anthropology and epistemology, viz., the “objective” or ontological view of the human being and the “subjectivism” often associated with the philosophy of consciousness, and their corollaries, realism and idealism.At least in the English speaking context, where the validity of individual experience has risen to the level of almost dogmatic significance for social and political life, Father Wojtyla’s claim appears either to have gone unnoticed or to have been rejected. And perhaps, at least on the surface, this is not without reason. The modern interest in human subjectivity is blamed for many contemporary maladies, including subjectivism, relativism and the pride of place now given to any individual point of view, no matter how ill informed. Claims about the existence of truth or an objective moral order often cannot find a foothold when confronted with the argument that such realities do not resonate with a particular individual’s personal “experience.” The priority given to subjective personal experience in determining what constitutes right thinking and moral human behavior, assuming that question is even asked, is now a commonplace assumption; it is something alternately deplored or celebrated both by intellectuals and the “man on the street.”Given this situation, that a philosopher of Father Wojtyla’s stature and obvious moral authority should make such an argument is a matter of critical importance, especially for those who seek to ground human action in objective moral norms in an era where an arguably flawed account of human subjectivity clearly has taken center stage. The paper shows that Wojtyla is not adverting to experience as an adjunct to moral relativism or personal preference as an approach to questions of the true and the good. On the contrary, the author shows that the philosopher Karol Wojtyla provides a way to remain grounded in the metaphysical and ontological categories that not only comprise our intellectual heritage, but refer to real and profound truths, while simultaneously accounting for the subjectivity and dynamism of the person. The paper concludes with an argument that this account provides a key hermeneutical device for understanding the enormous importance of the work of Pope John Paul II.
3. Roczniki Filozoficzne: Volume > 61 > Issue: 4
Sławomir Piechaczek
Sławomir Piechaczek
The Illusion of Buddhist Liberation in Emil Cioran’s Thought
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
4. Roczniki Filozoficzne: Volume > 61 > Issue: 4
Michał Kapias
Michał Kapias
Responsibility for the State of the Nation
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
5. Roczniki Filozoficzne: Volume > 61 > Issue: 4
Jan Kłos
Jan Kłos
Tetrad, or the Fourfold Pattern of Cultural Transformations
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
6. Roczniki Filozoficzne: Volume > 61 > Issue: 4
Paweł Gondek
Paweł Gondek
The Composites of Matter and Form as the Ontic Foundation of Pluralism in Aristotle’s Philosophy
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
7. Roczniki Filozoficzne: Volume > 61 > Issue: 4
Adam Gadoski
Adam Gadoski
Na temat uderzającego przypadku Jana Czochralskiego i jego osiągnięć naukowych pozwalających podkreślić ważność roku 2013 dla upamiętnienia tej postaci
abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
A question has been addressed, and then partly answered, namely, to what degree Jan Czochralski, an eminent and well-recognized abroad Polish crystallographer, chemist, and metallurgist, also a material (metal) scientist, should, when based on his achievements in research, belong to (physicochemical) metallurgy, or ought to be recognized rather as a (“pure”) chemist, working in a chemical fashion with metals and their impurities-containing alloys. The actual ground for trying to answer the intriguing question, relies on the fact that he performed his research entirely within physicochemical, or specifically, mechanochemical metallurgy of complex as well as very practical material systems that he was able to resolve successfully by his treatments. Its has been attempted to show that his type of research should be described as interdisciplinary, thus, being synergistically intermingled amongst a few crossdisciplines of technological and basic research. Astonishingly, his historical-context sensitive life, can also be viewed as the one being well networked amongst many areas of his activity, drawing him as inventor, university professor, owner, investor, art supporter, philanthropist, as well as some truly modest poetry author, or finally, husband and father of three children.

recenzje recenzje

8. Roczniki Filozoficzne: Volume > 61 > Issue: 4
Andrzej Bronk
Andrzej Bronk
Umoralnić życie publiczne. Luigiego Sturza doktryna społeczno-polityczna
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
9. Roczniki Filozoficzne: Volume > 61 > Issue: 4
Anna Głąb
Anna Głąb
God, Philosophy, Universities: A Selective History of the Catholic Philosophical Tradition
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
10. Roczniki Filozoficzne: Volume > 61 > Issue: 4
Antoni Szwed

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

artykuły artykuły

11. Roczniki Filozoficzne: Volume > 61 > Issue: 3
Andrzej Krzysztof Rogalski
Andrzej Krzysztof Rogalski
Universal Grammar
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
12. Roczniki Filozoficzne: Volume > 61 > Issue: 3
Renata Ziemińska
Renata Ziemińska
Two Notions of Truth and Two Concepts of the World
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
13. Roczniki Filozoficzne: Volume > 61 > Issue: 3
Ks. Michał Adamczyk
Ks. Michał Adamczyk
Science and Accuracy, i.e. towards J.F. Drewnowski Minimum Symbolic Apparatus
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
14. Roczniki Filozoficzne: Volume > 61 > Issue: 3
Marcin Trepczyński
Marcin Trepczyński
The Logic of Revealed Theology in the Works of Albert the Great and Thomas Aquinas
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
15. Roczniki Filozoficzne: Volume > 61 > Issue: 3
Ks. Marek Porwolik

abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
The present state of research reveals that basically Fr. J.M. Bochenski (1902-1995) left three versions of the formalizations of St. Thomas Aquinas’ fifth way. The first version comes from the article Die fünf Wege, published in 1989, and the third one, which is unauthorized, from the book Gottes Dasein und Wesen. Logische Studien zur Summa Theologiae I, qq. 2-11, published in Munich in 2003. These works are completed by the second version from two manuscripts of the book: one German (1989) and one Polish (1993).The above mentioned texts have shown the contribution made by Fr. J.M. Bochenski into the realization of the intended application of the tools of contemporary logic in the field of philosophy of God as well as theology. One of the main followers of these ideas in Austria has been Paul Weingartner (born 1931). In 2010 he published God’s Existence? A Logical Commentary on the Five Ways of Thomas Aquinas, a book which makes direct references to J.M. Bochenski’s works, and like Bochenski’s work it is a logical commentary to certain fragments of St. Thomas Aquinas’ Summa Theologiae.
16. Roczniki Filozoficzne: Volume > 61 > Issue: 3
Antoni Szwed
Antoni Szwed
Søren Kierkegaard’s Judgement on Martin Luther and Lutheranism
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
17. Roczniki Filozoficzne: Volume > 61 > Issue: 3
Jan Szot
Jan Szot
On some Determinats of the Fregean Theory of Quantification
view |  rights & permissions | cited by
18. Roczniki Filozoficzne: Volume > 61 > Issue: 3
Eugeniusz Wojciechowski
Eugeniusz Wojciechowski
Identity, Certain Functor Pronouns and Description
view |  rights & permissions | cited by

polemiki polemiki

19. Roczniki Filozoficzne: Volume > 61 > Issue: 3
Jacek Jarocki
Jacek Jarocki
Polemical Remarks on the Text by Katarzyna Kuś Imaging Notions as Testimonies to the Modal Beliefs
view |  rights & permissions | cited by

recenzje recenzje

20. Roczniki Filozoficzne: Volume > 61 > Issue: 3
Rafał Kupczak
Rafał Kupczak
Triply about Conscience
view |  rights & permissions | cited by