|
1.
|
Radical Philosophy Review:
Volume >
19 >
Issue: 3
Harry van der Linden
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
2.
|
Radical Philosophy Review:
Volume >
19 >
Issue: 3
Nathan J. Jun
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
In this essay I argue that what has been called “philosophical anarchism” in the academic literature bears little to no relationship with the historical anarchist tradition and, for this reason, ought not to be considered a genuine form of anarchism. As I will demonstrate, the classical anarchism of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries is to be distinguished from other political theories in regarding all hierarchical institutions and relationships—including, but not limited to, the state—as incorrigibly dominative or oppressive and, for this reason, immoral. Lastly, I argue that defenders of such institutions and relationships must take the challenge posed by classical anarchism seriously by engaging substantively with actual anarchist positions.
|
|
|
3.
|
Radical Philosophy Review:
Volume >
19 >
Issue: 3
Donald Kingsbury
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
The work of Ernesto Laclau develops a line of equivalences in which populism is hegemony is democracy is politics. Against this, I contend Laclau recreates rather than challenges basic tenets of modern liberalism and ultimately risks contributing to the “post political” order against his populist reason is deployed. Drawing from José Carlos Mariátegui, Antonio Gramsci, and Jodi Dean, I outline the limitations of hegemony theory and populism for thinking through the roadblocks and possibilities for social change in the present. The essay concludes with a provocation to de-center and de-fetishize democracy’s place in the radical imaginary.
|
|
|
4.
|
Radical Philosophy Review:
Volume >
19 >
Issue: 3
Tom Malleson
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
If climate change continues unabated it will create massive insecurity and displacement, particularly for people in the Global South, leading to extreme pressure to migrate to the Global North. Yet political policy in the North is overwhelmingly hostile to large-scale immigration. We are therefore on a collision course of increased pressure to migrate facing increased barriers to migration – a global structure I refer to as eco-apartheid. This paper argues that preventing eco-apartheid requires, fundamentally, a massive shift in culture – from a vision of a good life with growth and consumption at its centre, to one centered on community, free time and relationships. However, this shift in culture can only be accomplished with a corresponding shift in our economies towards real security for all; real economic security requires a new kind of robust welfare state, premised on the provision of generous public services and work sharing to maintain high employment.
|
|
|
5.
|
Radical Philosophy Review:
Volume >
19 >
Issue: 3
Patricia S. Mann
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
Why hasn’t the Marx-inspired Left seized upon catastrophic climate change as the basis for reconceiving historical materialism and the contradictions fueling anticapitalist struggle in the twenty-first century? Defining core participants as energy users and abusers, anchored in the opposition to fossil-fueled profit and growth rather than in traditional class conflicts, the struggle to create a postcapitalist energy commons can become the leading edge of a more broadly conceived global struggle for a sustainable and just postcapitalist society. The new global movement will be enabled by technologies of green energy microproduction, an energy internet for sharing energy on postcapitalist grids, and efforts to create more sustainable community relationships and practices. Catastrophic climate change can become the occasion for reigniting a Marx-inspired sense of transformative agency and solidarity that will enable us to confront transnational capitalism globally and locally in ways that are beyond the imaginative bounds of the current paper.
|
|
|
6.
|
Radical Philosophy Review:
Volume >
19 >
Issue: 3
Dan Wood
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
In this essay I argue that Slavoj Žižek’s “A Leftist Plea for ‘Eurocentrism’” betrays, in an exceptionally telling way, the existence and persistence of dimensions of modern colonialism within contemporary continental philosophy. After offering a general characterization of the way in which the idea of the “West” is used to justify (neo)colonialist patterns of thinking, I provide a thorough criticism of each of Žižek’s central premises.
|
|
|
|
7.
|
Radical Philosophy Review:
Volume >
19 >
Issue: 3
José Jorge Mendoza
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
8.
|
Radical Philosophy Review:
Volume >
19 >
Issue: 3
Lawrence Blum
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
9.
|
Radical Philosophy Review:
Volume >
19 >
Issue: 3
Myisha Cherry
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
10.
|
Radical Philosophy Review:
Volume >
19 >
Issue: 3
John Murungi
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
11.
|
Radical Philosophy Review:
Volume >
19 >
Issue: 3
Naomi Zack
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
12.
|
Radical Philosophy Review:
Volume >
19 >
Issue: 3
Mark Balawender
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
13.
|
Radical Philosophy Review:
Volume >
19 >
Issue: 3
Yuanfang Dai
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
14.
|
Radical Philosophy Review:
Volume >
19 >
Issue: 3
Noah De Lissovoy
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
15.
|
Radical Philosophy Review:
Volume >
19 >
Issue: 3
Milton Fisk,
Norman Fischer
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
16.
|
Radical Philosophy Review:
Volume >
19 >
Issue: 3
George Fourlas
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
17.
|
Radical Philosophy Review:
Volume >
19 >
Issue: 3
Todd Hedrick
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
18.
|
Radical Philosophy Review:
Volume >
19 >
Issue: 3
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
19.
|
Radical Philosophy Review:
Volume >
19 >
Issue: 2
Harry van der Linden
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
20.
|
Radical Philosophy Review:
Volume >
19 >
Issue: 2
Margaret A. McLaren,
Joshua Mills-Knutsen
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|