|
1.
|
Radical Philosophy Review:
Volume >
13 >
Issue: 2
Peter Gratton
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
2.
|
Radical Philosophy Review:
Volume >
13 >
Issue: 2
Harry van der Linden
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
3.
|
Radical Philosophy Review:
Volume >
13 >
Issue: 2
Joshua Rayman
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
The conventional view is that analytic philosophy has dominated American philosophy departments since 1950 and that continental philosophy and pragmatism have been marginalized almost out of existence due to philosophical inferiority or McCarthyist persecution. But a precise historical treatment of transformations in the field shows that this is, in fact, the golden age of continental philosophy and pragmatist scholarship, that McCarthyism had nothing to do with pragmatism’s fall from dominance, and that the shape of the field depends more on larger academic-historical trends. However, McCarthyism likely had lasting effects on analytic control of powerful qualifying institutions.
|
|
|
4.
|
Radical Philosophy Review:
Volume >
13 >
Issue: 2
Richard Ganis
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
En rapport with Jürgen Habermas, this paper argues for an environmental ethics that formalistically links the “good-for-nature” to the communicatively conceived “good-for-humanity.” This orientation guards against the possibility of humanity’s “knowledge-constitutive interest” in the instrumentalization of the environment being pressed forth as a project of limitless domination and mastery. Such an ethics is nonetheless well supplemented with Axel Honneth’s idea of an “indirect” recognitional attitude toward the world of objects, which accommodates the impulse of “care” for nature without succumbing to the aporias of a naturalistic ethic. The essay contends that the categorical resources needed to avert the slide toward naturalism are dissolved in the antifoundationalist “critiques of nature” advanced by Steven Vogel and Jacques Derrida.
|
|
|
|
5.
|
Radical Philosophy Review:
Volume >
13 >
Issue: 2
Cheyney Ryan
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
6.
|
Radical Philosophy Review:
Volume >
13 >
Issue: 2
Anatole Anton
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
7.
|
Radical Philosophy Review:
Volume >
13 >
Issue: 2
Michael Philip Brown
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
8.
|
Radical Philosophy Review:
Volume >
13 >
Issue: 2
Harry van der Linden
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
9.
|
Radical Philosophy Review:
Volume >
13 >
Issue: 2
Cheyney Ryan
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
10.
|
Radical Philosophy Review:
Volume >
13 >
Issue: 2
Matthew Quest
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
11.
|
Radical Philosophy Review:
Volume >
13 >
Issue: 2
Jorge Mario Rodríguez-Martinez
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
12.
|
Radical Philosophy Review:
Volume >
13 >
Issue: 2
Jordy Rocheleau
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
13.
|
Radical Philosophy Review:
Volume >
13 >
Issue: 2
Lasse Thomassen
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
14.
|
Radical Philosophy Review:
Volume >
13 >
Issue: 2
Evgeni V. Pavlov
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
15.
|
Radical Philosophy Review:
Volume >
13 >
Issue: 2
Peter Stone
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
16.
|
Radical Philosophy Review:
Volume >
13 >
Issue: 2
Matt Applegate
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
17.
|
Radical Philosophy Review:
Volume >
13 >
Issue: 2
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
18.
|
Radical Philosophy Review:
Volume >
13 >
Issue: 2
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
19.
|
Radical Philosophy Review:
Volume >
13 >
Issue: 2
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|