|
1.
|
Philosophical Inquiry:
Volume >
40 >
Issue: 3/4
D. Z. Andriopoulos
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
2.
|
Philosophical Inquiry:
Volume >
40 >
Issue: 3/4
Nickolas Pappas
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
3.
|
Philosophical Inquiry:
Volume >
40 >
Issue: 3/4
John P. Anton
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
4.
|
Philosophical Inquiry:
Volume >
40 >
Issue: 3/4
Theodore Scaltsas
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
5.
|
Philosophical Inquiry:
Volume >
40 >
Issue: 3/4
Kevin Crotty
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
6.
|
Philosophical Inquiry:
Volume >
40 >
Issue: 3/4
Gerasimos Santas
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
7.
|
Philosophical Inquiry:
Volume >
40 >
Issue: 3/4
Michael Naas
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
8.
|
Philosophical Inquiry:
Volume >
40 >
Issue: 3/4
Christos Y. Panayides
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
9.
|
Philosophical Inquiry:
Volume >
40 >
Issue: 3/4
D. Z. Andriopoulos
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
10.
|
Philosophical Inquiry:
Volume >
40 >
Issue: 3/4
Thanassis Samaras
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
11.
|
Philosophical Inquiry:
Volume >
40 >
Issue: 3/4
Paul Schollmeier
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
12.
|
Philosophical Inquiry:
Volume >
40 >
Issue: 3/4
Dionysios A. Anapolitanos
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
13.
|
Philosophical Inquiry:
Volume >
40 >
Issue: 3/4
Erjus Mezini
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
Plato’s account of justice in the Republic has been questioned by David Sachs, who charges Plato for committing a fallacy of irrelevance. Sachs’ objection is built on the assumption that Plato has employed two accounts of justice: a vulgar one, and a Platonic one. Insofar as Socrates’ interlocutors hold a vulgar conception, then Socrates should prove to them that being vulgarly just will be benefi cial to them. But Socrates, according to Sachs, never does that. Through emphasizing the dialogues of Socrates with his interlocutors, this essay shows incorrect the assumption that Plato is holding two accounts of justice. The dialogues in the Republic demonstrate that there are vulgar confusions, rather than a vulgar ideology. Furthermore, through defi ning justice as the dominance of reason over humans and politics, and through relating reason to the Good, Plato leaves open the possibility that some vulgar actions conform to his account of justice.
|
|
|
|
14.
|
Philosophical Inquiry:
Volume >
40 >
Issue: 3/4
Raphael Demos
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
15.
|
Philosophical Inquiry:
Volume >
40 >
Issue: 3/4
Raphael Demos
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|