Already a subscriber? - Login here
Not yet a subscriber? - Subscribe here

Browse by:



Displaying: 1-20 of 28 documents


1. Philosophy Today: Volume > 15 > Issue: 4
Patrick Bourgeois

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

2. Philosophy Today: Volume > 15 > Issue: 4
John McGinley

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

3. Philosophy Today: Volume > 15 > Issue: 4
Paul Tibbetts

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

4. Philosophy Today: Volume > 15 > Issue: 4
George J. Stack

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

5. Philosophy Today: Volume > 15 > Issue: 4
Robert Vanden Burgt

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

6. Philosophy Today: Volume > 15 > Issue: 4
John Carmody

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

7. Philosophy Today: Volume > 15 > Issue: 4

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

8. Philosophy Today: Volume > 15 > Issue: 4

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

9. Philosophy Today: Volume > 15 > Issue: 3
F. Joseph Smith

abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
The following frank comments on the subject of analysis, though they obviously represent a preliminary examination af some of the problems that emerge between philosophical analysis and phenomenology as the two major trends in contemporary philosophy, are conceived by the present author in a much broader manner than the mere confrontation of two apparently opposing schools of thought. Due to the emergent nature of these themes, some adagio, others allegro, it has been impossible to arrange them in the usual systematic manner. (This difficulty was experienced in a grander manner by Wittgenstein himself, as his remarks in Philosophical Investigations plainly show.) Whatever in these comments is "offensive" to either phenomenologist or analyst derives from the fact that this is only a preliminary study, in which the author is orienting himself and preparing for more systematic and thorough-going dialogue with sympathetic analyst friends and phenomenologist critics. (More developed thoughts and satisfactory conclusions should be reached in my forthcoming review essay on H. Khatchadourian's A Study in Critical Method, now being written for The Journal of Value Inquiry.) What is presented here to friend, foe, and general philosophical reader, is a selection of themes that have puzzled me greatly. I offer them without any of the usual excuses and with the hope that to some extent this discussion may bring philosophers together, so that we can begin to lind the common ground, on which to make our contribution to contemporary thought the more truly convincing.

10. Philosophy Today: Volume > 15 > Issue: 3

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

11. Philosophy Today: Volume > 15 > Issue: 3
Walter Robert Goedecke

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

12. Philosophy Today: Volume > 15 > Issue: 3

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

13. Philosophy Today: Volume > 15 > Issue: 3
John J. Mood

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

14. Philosophy Today: Volume > 15 > Issue: 3
Michel Henry

abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Jean-Paul Sartre insists that Marxism is the only philosophy that speaks to and out of the condition of contemporary man. Each cultural period has but onephilosophy that is authentic. Today, that philosophy is Marxism. Even if one accepts Sartre's position, it is clear that Marxism today is not one monolithic ideologydeveloped by proclamation. A recent group of articles in Philosophy Today (Winter 1970), devoted to the thought of Ernst Bloch, indicated this. The two followingarticles of Michel Henry and Arthur McGovern indicate further some of the sources of diverse interpretations and positions. (Editor)

15. Philosophy Today: Volume > 15 > Issue: 3
Arthur F. McGovern

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

16. Philosophy Today: Volume > 15 > Issue: 3
Maurice Friedman

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

17. Philosophy Today: Volume > 15 > Issue: 2
The Editor

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

18. Philosophy Today: Volume > 15 > Issue: 2
Hans Jonas

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

19. Philosophy Today: Volume > 15 > Issue: 2
Carl Mitcham, Robert Mackey

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

20. Philosophy Today: Volume > 15 > Issue: 2
Donald Brinkmann

view |  rights & permissions | cited by