|
1.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 2
Augustin Riška
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
In this essay I investigate the interplay between actual and potential properties of a thing within an Aristotelian conceptual framework. A minimal formal treatment of such interplay is proposed, outlining the actual or possible causal impact of these properties with respect to the changes of a thing in question. I also mention the historically interesting controversy between Aristotle and the Megarians concerning the relationship between power and act, as well as Hintikka’s application of the Principle of Plenitude. The essay ends with certain suggestions for treating the problems of actual and potential properties by means of dispositions and contrary-to-fact conditionals.
|
|
|
2.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 2
David Svoboda
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
The article deals with the problem of the future contingents from the logical point of view, i.e. whether the propositions about (conditional) future contingents have a determinate truth-value. The author attemps to show how the problem was discussed both in the 17. century between a Prague’s Jesuit M. Větrovský and a French Dominican A. Goudin, as well as how the discussion has progressed through contemporary analytical philosophy. Firstly the history of the problem is explored to provide the sources for the discussion. Secondly the polemic of Větrovský with Goudin is examined and finally how A. J. Freddoso and W. L. Craig discuss the problem in contemporary analytical philosophy. The essential aspect of the argument is whether the propositions about (conditional) future contingents might have a determinate truth-value if the causal grounding (futuritio causalis) is being detached.
|
|
|
3.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 2
Prokop Sousedík
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
In this article I consider two aspects of Moore’s philosophical method which lead to the turn to natural language. These are his interest in the meaning (not the truth) of problematic philosophical theses and his interest in common sense philosophy. However, Moore himself did not completely achieve the linguistic turn: he merely prepared the way for it. In the conclusions I show that Moore’s themes were developed by N. Malcom. The deeper sense of my paper is to show that the linguistic turn as begun by Moore does not conflict with the spirit of the Aristotelian tradition.
|
|
|
|
4.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 2
Thomas Williams
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
5.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 2
Stanislav Sousedík
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
6.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 2
Alfred J. Freddoso
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
7.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 2
David Peroutka OCD
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
8.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 2
Lukáš Novák
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
9.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 2
Ladislav Koreň
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
10.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 2
Daniel Dominik Novotný
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
11.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 2
Anna Klimeková
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
12.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 2
Tomáš Nejeschleba
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
13.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 2
Tomáš Nejeschleba
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
14.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 2
Stanislav Sousedík
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
15.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 2
Stanislav Sousedík
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
16.
|
Studia Neoaristotelica:
Volume >
2 >
Issue: 2
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|