|
1.
|
Newman Studies Journal:
Volume >
7 >
Issue: 2
John T. Ford, c.s.c.
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
2.
|
Newman Studies Journal:
Volume >
7 >
Issue: 2
Adam Stewart
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
This essay examines the contrasting conceptualizations of reason in the thought of John Henry Newman and Andrew Martin Fairbairn in their articles published in The Contemporary Review in 1885. This essay articulates both Fairbairn’s charge of philosophical scepticism against Newman as well as Newman’s defense of his position and concomitantly details Fairbairn’s and Newman’s competing notions of the efficacy of reason to provide reliable knowledge of God. The positions of Fairbairn and Newman remain two of the most important perspectives on the role of reason in the acquisition of knowledge about God in nineteenth- and twentieth-century Christian theology.
|
|
|
3.
|
Newman Studies Journal:
Volume >
7 >
Issue: 2
Robert Saley
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
This essay investigates the problem of reconciling contingent historical facts and immutable dogma in light of two different models of figural historiography, presented respectively in John Henry Newman’s Essay on the Development of Christian Doctrine and Henri de Lubac’s Catholicism: A Study of Dogma in Relation to the Corporate Destiny of Mankind. Although Newman and de Lubac’s approaches to history were quite different, they are fundamentally complementary.
|
|
|
4.
|
Newman Studies Journal:
Volume >
7 >
Issue: 2
Marcin Kuczok
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
From the perspective of cognitive linguistics, metaphor is a way of thinking and understanding rather than an ornamental device used for aesthetic purposes.Conceptual metaphor constitutes a natural device for comprehending those areas of reality that exceed what is describable by literal terms, including especially the sphere of religious experiences. The purpose of this essay is to analyze the conceptual metaphors employed by John Henry Newman in the first volume of his Parochial and Plain Sermons (1834) as a way of explaining the transcendental character of the concept of Christian life.
|
|
|
5.
|
Newman Studies Journal:
Volume >
7 >
Issue: 2
Alexander Miller
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
Among the most overlooked sources for studying Newman’s epistemology are his sermons, particularly his Parochial and Plain Sermons. This essay compares Newman’s sermon “Religious Faith Rational” (1829) and his discussion of “Simple Assent” in his Grammar of Assent (1870), both of which defend faith or assent in daily life; this comparison reveals both a strong influence of the sermons on the Grammar and a shift in Newman’s understanding of the term “faith.”
|
|
|
6.
|
Newman Studies Journal:
Volume >
7 >
Issue: 2
Michael Keating
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
After Newman’s decision to become a Roman Catholic in 1845, Oxford witnessed a fierce battle over the future of the university: would Oxford remain a Christian and Anglican institution, or would it become a purely national, and secular, endeavor? On the Anglican side, the most weighty protagonist was Newman’s former colleague, Edward Pusey. Among those arguing for a national and secular university was Henry Halford Vaughan. In the early 1850s, Pusey and Vaughan engaged in a written controversy, in which they respectively championed a tutorial and a professorial model of learning. However, the issues at stake were much broader than mere pedagogy, and went to the heart of the nature of the institution as a whole.
|
|
|
|
7.
|
Newman Studies Journal:
Volume >
7 >
Issue: 2
Vinh Bao Luu-Quang
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
This sermon-study—a sequel to a previous study of Newman’s theology of the Immanent Trinity, 1829–1834 (NSJ 7/1: 73–86)—examines Newman’s theology of the Trinity in the economy of salvation. Viewing the mystery of the Incarnation as the Revelation of Theologia in Oikonomia, Newman developed a “theology of glorification” and a “theology of within-ness,” which in turn grounded a “theology of Rest and Peace.” Newman’s Trinitarian theology (1835–1841), which was deeply influenced by the Fathers of the Church, was simultaneously his response to the anti-dogmatic Liberalism that rejected Christ’s divinity and so denied the Trinity.
|
|
|
|
8.
|
Newman Studies Journal:
Volume >
7 >
Issue: 2
Edward J. Enright, O.S.A.
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
9.
|
Newman Studies Journal:
Volume >
7 >
Issue: 2
Gerald H. McCarren
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
10.
|
Newman Studies Journal:
Volume >
7 >
Issue: 2
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
11.
|
Newman Studies Journal:
Volume >
7 >
Issue: 2
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
12.
|
Newman Studies Journal:
Volume >
7 >
Issue: 2
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|