Already a subscriber? - Login here
Not yet a subscriber? - Subscribe here

Browse by:



Displaying: 1-19 of 19 documents


1. Radical Philosophy Review: Volume > 13 > Issue: 2
Peter Gratton

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

2. Radical Philosophy Review: Volume > 13 > Issue: 2
Harry van der Linden

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

articles

3. Radical Philosophy Review: Volume > 13 > Issue: 2
Joshua Rayman

abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
The conventional view is that analytic philosophy has dominated American philosophy departments since 1950 and that continental philosophy and pragmatism have been marginalized almost out of existence due to philosophical inferiority or McCarthyist persecution. But a precise historical treatment of transformations in the field shows that this is, in fact, the golden age of continental philosophy and pragmatist scholarship, that McCarthyism had nothing to do with pragmatism’s fall from dominance, and that the shape of the field depends more on larger academic-historical trends. However, McCarthyism likely had lasting effects on analytic control of powerful qualifying institutions.
4. Radical Philosophy Review: Volume > 13 > Issue: 2
Richard Ganis

abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
En rapport with Jürgen Habermas, this paper argues for an environmental ethics that formalistically links the “good-for-nature” to the communicatively conceived “good-for-humanity.” This orientation guards against the possibility of humanity’s “knowledge-constitutive interest” in the instrumentalization of the environment being pressed forth as a project of limitless domination and mastery. Such an ethics is nonetheless well supplemented with Axel Honneth’s idea of an “indirect” recognitional attitude toward the world of objects, which accommodates the impulse of “care” for nature without succumbing to the aporias of a naturalistic ethic. The essay contends that the categorical resources needed to avert the slide toward naturalism are dissolved in the antifoundationalist “critiques of nature” advanced by Steven Vogel and Jacques Derrida.

symposium

5. Radical Philosophy Review: Volume > 13 > Issue: 2
Cheyney Ryan

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
6. Radical Philosophy Review: Volume > 13 > Issue: 2
Anatole Anton

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
7. Radical Philosophy Review: Volume > 13 > Issue: 2
Michael Philip Brown

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
8. Radical Philosophy Review: Volume > 13 > Issue: 2
Harry van der Linden

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
9. Radical Philosophy Review: Volume > 13 > Issue: 2
Cheyney Ryan

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

book reviews

10. Radical Philosophy Review: Volume > 13 > Issue: 2
Matthew Quest

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
11. Radical Philosophy Review: Volume > 13 > Issue: 2
Jorge Mario Rodríguez-Martinez

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
12. Radical Philosophy Review: Volume > 13 > Issue: 2
Jordy Rocheleau

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
13. Radical Philosophy Review: Volume > 13 > Issue: 2
Lasse Thomassen

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
14. Radical Philosophy Review: Volume > 13 > Issue: 2
Evgeni V. Pavlov

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
15. Radical Philosophy Review: Volume > 13 > Issue: 2
Peter Stone

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
16. Radical Philosophy Review: Volume > 13 > Issue: 2
Matt Applegate

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

17. Radical Philosophy Review: Volume > 13 > Issue: 2

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

18. Radical Philosophy Review: Volume > 13 > Issue: 2

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

19. Radical Philosophy Review: Volume > 13 > Issue: 2

view |  rights & permissions | cited by