Already a subscriber? - Login here
Not yet a subscriber? - Subscribe here

Browse by:



Displaying: 1-16 of 16 documents


1. Newman Studies Journal: Volume > 11 > Issue: 2
Celeste Barker Bright, Kevin Mongrain

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

articles

2. Newman Studies Journal: Volume > 11 > Issue: 2
Steven D. Aguzzi

abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
In recent years, critical discourse concerning the millenarian eschatology of the early Patristic era of Christianity has called into question the common notion that millenarian concepts have been utterly rejected as heretical by the Roman Catholic Church. No Ecumenical Council has ever rejected millenarian eschatology, and papal and juridical statements on the issue have been taken out of context. This essay brings forward, as testing agents, John Henry Newman’s first two notes in Development in order to determine whether Patristic millenarianism, along with a more recently explored version called Eucharistic millenarianism, is a valid example of doctrinal development of an earlier type. Eucharistic millenarianism borrows many aspects from a primitive apostolic source and has been embraced by the Catholic hierarchy, raising the question of how millenarian aspects might legitimately inform contemporary theology. Newman’s theory of the development of doctrine, particularly as seen in his first two notes, is a valuable tool for reevaluating latent concepts that have been unfairly viewed as marginal or even heretical in mainline theological discourse.
3. Newman Studies Journal: Volume > 11 > Issue: 2
Jonathan Martin Ciraulo

abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
This essay analyzes Newman’s response to the tendency in philosophical modernity and liberal Protestantism, as exemplified by John Locke, to denigrate the so-called “superstitious” nature of the religion of the masses. Newman constructed a philosophical and theological defense of Christians who were accused of an unenlightened superstition, due to their popular piety and lack of theological training, and proposes this very “superstition” to be the hallmark of genuine Christianity, as found from its inception. The essay concludes with a comparison to Augustine’s City of God.
4. Newman Studies Journal: Volume > 11 > Issue: 2
Kota Kanno

abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
The first scientific work by John Henry Newman, Arians of the Fourth Century, should not be read simply as a patristic historiography; Newman engages with theoretical problems in this work. This essay attempts to explain the theory behind Arians with particular regard to the problematic relationship between Scripture and doctrinal expression in the Church. It will demonstrate the confluence of Newman’s thought on this point with the theological reflection of Vincent Holzer, who discusses this problem in the context of German theology in the twentieth century. This article was originally published in French in Études Newmaniennes no. 29 (2013).

newman lecture series

5. Newman Studies Journal: Volume > 11 > Issue: 2
Brad S. Gregory

abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
John Henry Newman was a discerning critic of the dominant social values and cultural features of England in the Victorian era that revolved around the sovereign self. Insofar as many of these features—individuals as their own masters, wealth and celebrity, the arbitrariness of answers about faith and meaning, and the character of higher education in the absence of theology—also characterize American society and culture in the early twenty-first century, Newman’s critique of his own time and society also applies to ours. This essay was first delivered as the 2014 Newman Legacy Lecture, sponsored by the National Institute for Newman Studies, at Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, on April 3, 2014.

book review

6. Newman Studies Journal: Volume > 11 > Issue: 2
Kevin Mongrain

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

nins update

7. Newman Studies Journal: Volume > 11 > Issue: 2
Mary Jo Dorsey

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

8. Newman Studies Journal: Volume > 11 > Issue: 2

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

9. Newman Studies Journal: Volume > 11 > Issue: 2

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

10. Newman Studies Journal: Volume > 11 > Issue: 1
Kevin Mongrain, Ph.D., Celeste Barker Bright, Ph.D.

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

articles

11. Newman Studies Journal: Volume > 11 > Issue: 1
Keith Beaumont

abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Newman was keenly aware of the challenge posed to Christians by the development of historical biblical criticism in the nineteenth century. In several of his Anglican writings—most notably in no. 85 of Tracts for the Times, in unpublished notes and drafts dating from 1861–1863, and in two essays published in 1884—he attempted to resolve questions regarding the nature of biblical “inspiration,” the respective roles of the divine and human “authors,” and the nature of biblical “truth.” This article, originally a paper given at the 2012 conference of the Association française des Amis de Newman on Newman et la Bible, was first published in French in Études Newmaniennes no. 29 (2013).
12. Newman Studies Journal: Volume > 11 > Issue: 1
Pedro A. Benítez

abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Personalist philosopher Maurice Nédoncelle was known for his role in reintroducing John Henry Newman to the French public at a time when it was well needed. Nédoncelle’s merits consist mainly of presenting Newman as a religious philosopher and of drawing attention to Newman’s implicit philosophy. Nédoncelle’s interpretation of Newman is discussed here.
13. Newman Studies Journal: Volume > 11 > Issue: 1
Christopher Cimorelli

abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
In this article, I investigate Newman’s understanding of doctrinal development, specifically regarding the accumulation of doctrines over time. Through an analysis of Newman’s essay on development and a letter written by him in 1868, we can better understand the potential “advantage,” but not superiority, that comes from the everincreasing resources of tradition. Newman’s view of development is directed toward the present and abiding concern to maintain fidelity to the deposit of faith, or to what he understands to be a “sacred philosophy.”

nins update

14. Newman Studies Journal: Volume > 11 > Issue: 1
Mary Jo Dorsey

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

15. Newman Studies Journal: Volume > 11 > Issue: 1

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

16. Newman Studies Journal: Volume > 11 > Issue: 1

view |  rights & permissions | cited by