|
1.
|
Philotheos:
Volume >
8
Richard Schaeffler
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
2.
|
Philotheos:
Volume >
8
Wolfgang Speyer
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
3.
|
Philotheos:
Volume >
8
Hermann Schmitz
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
4.
|
Philotheos:
Volume >
8
Richard Wisser
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
5.
|
Philotheos:
Volume >
8
Kofi Ackah
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
6.
|
Philotheos:
Volume >
8
John Mouracade
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
7.
|
Philotheos:
Volume >
8
Tschasslaw D. Kopriwitza
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
8.
|
Philotheos:
Volume >
8
Matthieu Guyot
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
9.
|
Philotheos:
Volume >
8
Юрий Анатольевич Шичалин
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
10.
|
Philotheos:
Volume >
8
Dionysis Skliris
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
11.
|
Philotheos:
Volume >
8
Mary C. Sheridan
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
12.
|
Philotheos:
Volume >
8
Edward Moore
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
13.
|
Philotheos:
Volume >
8
Vasilije Vranić
abstract |
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
The mid fifth century was largely marked by a Christological controversy that began with private teachings of the ambassador of the Alexandrian see to Constantinople, the prominent Archimandrite Eutyches. The precise teaching of Eutyches remains somewhat obscure, since no written work by him is extant. Thus, everything that the modern historical scholarship knows about Eutyches’ theology comes from secondary sources, such as the writings of his opponents or scontemporary Synodal Acts. Consequently, the fine points of Eutyches’ Christological position are subject of scholarly debate. However, on the basis of the unchallenged contemporary historical evidence, as it is found in the original trial of Eutyches for heresy at the Synod of Constantinople in 448 AD, a critical evaluation of Eutyches’ Christological position seems possible. In this article it was argued that the Christological teaching of Eutyches was inadequate in terms of the later Christological standard set at Chalcedon (451 AD).
|
|
|
|
14.
|
Philotheos:
Volume >
8
Heidi Marx-Wolf
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
15.
|
Philotheos:
Volume >
8
Markus Enders
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
16.
|
Philotheos:
Volume >
8
Βασίλειος Ἀθ. Τσίγκος
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
17.
|
Philotheos:
Volume >
8
Predrag Čičovački
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
18.
|
Philotheos:
Volume >
8
Evgenia V. Cherkasova
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
19.
|
Philotheos:
Volume >
8
Thomas Sören Hoffmann
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|
|
20.
|
Philotheos:
Volume >
8
Josef Seifert
view |
rights & permissions
| cited by
|
|
|