Cover of Canadian Journal of Philosophy
>> Go to Current Issue

Canadian Journal of Philosophy

Volume 30, Issue Supplement, 2000
Moral Epistemology Naturalized

Table of Contents

Already a subscriber? - Login here
Not yet a subscriber? - Subscribe here

Browse by:



Displaying: 1-13 of 13 documents


1. Canadian Journal of Philosophy: Volume > 30 > Issue: Supplement
Richmond Campbell, Bruce Hunter

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

moral naturalism and normativity

2. Canadian Journal of Philosophy: Volume > 30 > Issue: Supplement
David Copp

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
3. Canadian Journal of Philosophy: Volume > 30 > Issue: Supplement
Margaret Urban Walker

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
4. Canadian Journal of Philosophy: Volume > 30 > Issue: Supplement
Louise Antony

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
5. Canadian Journal of Philosophy: Volume > 30 > Issue: Supplement
Susan Babbitt

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
6. Canadian Journal of Philosophy: Volume > 30 > Issue: Supplement
Lorraine Code

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

biology and moral discourse

7. Canadian Journal of Philosophy: Volume > 30 > Issue: Supplement
Catherine Wilson

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
8. Canadian Journal of Philosophy: Volume > 30 > Issue: Supplement
Michael Stingl

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
9. Canadian Journal of Philosophy: Volume > 30 > Issue: Supplement
Andy Clark

abstract | view |  rights & permissions | cited by
Recent work in cognitive science highlights the importance of exemplar-based know-how in supporting human expertise. Influenced by this model, certain accounts of moral knowledge now stress exemplar-based, non-sentential know-how at the expense of rule-and-principle based accounts. I shall argue, however, that moral thought and reason cannot be understood by reference to either of these roles alone. Moral cognition -- like other forms of ‘advanced’ cognition -- depends crucially on the subtle interplay and interaction of multiple factors and forces and especially (or so I argue) between the use of linguistic tools and formulations and more biologically basic forms of thought and reason.
10. Canadian Journal of Philosophy: Volume > 30 > Issue: Supplement
Paul Churchland

view |  rights & permissions | cited by
11. Canadian Journal of Philosophy: Volume > 30 > Issue: Supplement
Andy Clark

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

12. Canadian Journal of Philosophy: Volume > 30 > Issue: Supplement

view |  rights & permissions | cited by

13. Canadian Journal of Philosophy: Volume > 30 > Issue: Supplement

view |  rights & permissions | cited by